as ken mogg clearly knows, i've been unable to stop talking nonsense all these years -- alas!!! . . . still, it's always nice to be remembered, even if only as a fool
but if the truffaut book is really a picture of hitchcock's mind, and not merely a picture that he wants us to see -- something he clearly was good at manipulating -- then so much the worse for his mind . . . in reading hitchcock one always finds it useful to keep in mind the words of one of hitchcock's older british contemporaries, d.h. lawrence: "never trust the teller, trust the tale"
as half a century of fine and at times brilliant critical commentary has shown, the tales are remarkable -- but one has to have some serious misgivings about the teller
mike
----------------------------------
-----Original Message-----
From: Film-Philosophy Salon [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ken Mogg
Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 1:04 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: the vertigo shot
Oh dear, Mike hasn't changed his position on this in years! But in fact
Hitchcock's interview with Truffaut surely remains the most salient of all
books on Hitchcock's films, and is to be brushed aside by scholars at their
peril, i.e., at the risk of not seeing the forest for the trees and/or of
talking nonsense!
Ultimately, of course, the book exists to illuminate how Hitchcock's mind
worked and to thereby provide a key to the inventiveness and facility of a
cinematic genius (for which, see Stirling Silliphant on working with
Hitchcock, in 'BackStory 3', edited by Pat McGilligan - the relevant passage
is on the Web and can be Googled). Once Hitchcock saw how all life is grist
to the mill of 'pure film', he was freed to invent 'forms'. ('Hitchcock is
the greatest inventor of forms in the history of the cinema' - Claude
Chabrol.) Someone has said of Leonardo that he literally saw everything -
life, his work - in terms of swirling motion, and I think there's an analogy
to be drawn there with Hitchcock (who was trained in graphic art and
mechanical engineering).
May I take this opportunity to mention to 'Film-Philosophy' readers that my
"Editor's Week" blogging on Hitchcock resumed last May - after I had been
away for eight months (URL below). Also, that my monograph on Hitchcock's
THE BIRDS (35,000 words, including an appendix on Hitchcock and the
principle of sufficient reason) comes out in, I think, the next few days, as
a downloadable e-book, in 'Senses of Cinema' #51. ('Top-drawer stuff' -
David Sterritt. 'An absolute joy to read' - Scott Murray.)
- Ken Mogg
http://www.labyrinth.net.au/~muffin/news-home_c.html
*
*
Film-Philosophy salon
After hitting 'reply' please always delete the text of the message you are replying to.
To leave, send the message: leave film-philosophy to: [log in to unmask]
Or visit: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/film-philosophy.html
For help email: [log in to unmask], not the salon.
*
Film-Philosophy online: http://www.film-philosophy.com
Contact: [log in to unmask]
**
*
*
Film-Philosophy salon
After hitting 'reply' please always delete the text of the message you are replying to.
To leave, send the message: leave film-philosophy to: [log in to unmask]
Or visit: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/film-philosophy.html
For help email: [log in to unmask], not the salon.
*
Film-Philosophy online: http://www.film-philosophy.com
Contact: [log in to unmask]
**
|