Hi Jose,
Perhaps its simpler to see differences by looking at the reverse:
Would you accept the meaning of a written academic paper as an entry of
equal worth to a great graphic in an international graphic design
competition? Could it win the competition?
If not, why?
Terry
-----Original Message-----
From: PhD-Design - This list is for discussion of PhD studies and related
research in Design [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Don
Norman
Sent: Sunday, 3 May 2009 12:24 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: On publication: Advancing the state of knowledge VS. Being
recognized
Jose Luis Casamayor asks:
-----------------------
- This question is related with Robbie's question (what i think he meant in
his question). If one practitioner and one 'researcher' present their
'research' outcomes, namely a paper and a physical artefact, and both are
presented to an academic peer review (which is the one that counts for
academic/research purposes) which one would be considered or they would be
considered equally?
-----------
|