JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN Archives

PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN  April 2009

PHD-DESIGN April 2009

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: a democratic design process (?)

From:

Terence Love <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Terence Love <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 06:58:33 +0800

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (235 lines)

Dear  Gunes, Cigdem and Chris,

Cigdem raises a important issue based on Gunes query that is central to
design and design research and yet I've never seen raised on this list. 

"Is Culture a positive of a negative factor in design, and why?"

Thinking about what what Cigdem raised seems to me to be pretty  complex. Is
culture the 'will of the people writ large' (as in a collection of social
practices); 'a powerful and subtle tool of the rich and powerful to
condition people to behave in ways that enable the rich and powerful to
increase their wealth and power'; something else...? 

Should designers build on culture, suck up to it....?  

Does the lazy enactment of cultural practice block improvements to human
development?

I'd welcome people's thoughts

Best,

Terry
 

-----Original Message-----
From: PhD-Design - This list is for discussion of PhD studies and related
research in Design [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Cigdem
Kaya
Sent: Wednesday, 15 April 2009 1:02 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: a democratic design process (?)

Hello Gunes,

Last year, I too signed the petition for the ferries not to be changed with
the 'modern ones'.
However, my first ride made me thoughtful because it was unexpectedly easier
to get on and get off. The structured seemed new and well engineered. Thus
my observations are made through the eyes of a designer who happens to be
one of the plain passengers.Yes, it might be deceptive. Our understanding of
safety on water might be as shallow as 'being stable' rather than a rough
ride.

About involving the passengers to the decision making process in design...
Referring to my first ride, i was wonderous about how people would find
another way of keeping their daily habit of feeding the gulls no matter what
kind of a *designed* vehicle they ride in. In other words, how does this
upgrade of technology evolve the everday habits of the passengers as opposed
to designing in regard to protect the present cultural richness? It seems
like it will be very exciting to watch how everyday social practices survive
as a resistance no matter what the design of the ferry is like. I know there
is a giant literature on culture as resistance but I wont be able to name
any on top of my head right now.

Thank you for bringing up the issue.

Cigdem


Alinti gunes tavmen <[log in to unmask]>

> That's exactly the point Çiğdem. Nobody is against the safe ride, 
> however there should be a better way to preserve some cultural 
> richness while you enhance the security.
>
> As a matter of fact, I am also curious how you decided they are safer.
> Because in the big southeast wind when those new ferries started to 
> operate, they weren't able to ride as the old ones did. And possibly 
> you know seabuses are the most effected ones from those winds as well, 
> though they are considered to be "more modern" and "technologically 
> advanced". Feeling of safeness can be deceptive sometimes... (By the 
> way in some ways they might be safer but all we can say is 'might', 
> nobody actually really knows)
>
> Yet again thanks a lot for your responses...
>
> Güneş
>
>
> 14 Nisan 2009 Salı 01:44 tarihinde Cigdem Kaya <[log in to unmask]> yazdı:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I can't help but say a word about the new ferries of Istanbul. Born 
>> and raised in Istanbul, I used to cross the Bosphorus twice, every 
>> single day, with the ferry between home and school for a long time.
>> It's funny... today I had my first ride in the "new" ferry after 
>> being abroad for three months.
>> I guess it is the first time that I didnt worry about sitting by the 
>> door so that it is easier to jump off to the water in case of a 
>> disaster which seemed quite possible in those very beautiful but very
tired ferries.
>>  I have not thought about the design of the new ferries and I dont 
>> think they are *designed* at all. But I have experienced that they 
>> are definitely safer. That was not an aspect that I thought mattered 
>> that much until today's ride.
>> If you ride it for fun, it is nostalgic and very representative of 
>> the city However, if you have to ride it twice a day the experience 
>> seems to change so much! Thus, safety was a priority for me.
>> Best,
>> Cigdem
>>
>> Alinti gunes tavmen <[log in to unmask]>
>>
>>
>> First of all thanks a lot to everyone for your quick and helpfull
replies.
>>>
>>> The point is, in that case I take public transportation as a case 
>>> study, so what I had focused was the concept of 'democracy and 
>>> design' or 'politics and design'. Maybe I should be giving more 
>>> details on that particular case; these vapurettes they 'renewed' are 
>>> in a way symbol of Istanbul and are very strong cultural 
>>> representations. Unlike any other transportation means available 
>>> here, there are some special social habits attached to those like 
>>> feeding seagulls, drinking tea on the terrace etc.  So it seems or 
>>> at least seemed to me, the question here is a bit different than a 
>>> general transportation planning.
>>>
>>> As a person who has studied 'science and technology studies - STS', 
>>> I was expecting to find a debate on the problem of determining the
'experts'
>>> when
>>> society is involved in a design process. In STS, the question of 
>>> 'who should be and/or are involved and to what extent' is a very big 
>>> question, and I was kind of trying to apply that into design. Terry, 
>>> I would appreciate if you could provide those references you have 
>>> mentioned although I believe none of those techniques are applied in 
>>> my city.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Güneş
>>>
>>>
>>> 2009/4/13 Terence Love <[log in to unmask]>
>>>
>>> Dear Gunes,
>>>>
>>>> There is a large literature on this topic since the second world 
>>>> war (and before).
>>>>
>>>> You could begin with a simple search on Google such as "community 
>>>> participation transport planning". The first 500  or so web pages 
>>>> should give you a start!
>>>>
>>>> You might also find it conceptually useful and good fun to read 
>>>> Illich's work on transport conviviality and his book Energy and Equity.
>>>>
>>>> Also be aware that there a significant amount of work ( mainly form 
>>>> the 1980s and now hard to get hold of) seriously criticizing the 
>>>> participation and collaboration techniques used by planners and 
>>>> designers. Many of these techniques are in use currently and 
>>>> uncritically regarded as unproblematic by current planners and 
>>>> designers who are unaware of the deep criticisms of them and the 
>>>> failure of the techniques in terms of equity, ethics and succesful 
>>>> outcomes. If you want, I can provide some references.
>>>>
>>>> Good luck,
>>>>
>>>> Terry
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: PhD-Design - This list is for discussion of PhD studies and 
>>>> related research in Design [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On 
>>>> Behalf Of gunes tavmen
>>>> Sent: Monday, 13 April 2009 4:19 AM
>>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>>> Subject: a democratic design process (?)
>>>>
>>>> Dear List-followers,
>>>> I am currently working on a question of 'whether the proess of 
>>>> public transportation design can be AND/OR should be democratic and 
>>>> participative?'. It is quite difficult to find references about the 
>>>> 'design and politics' issue whereas there is a long debate on the 
>>>> 'politics of artefacts' from the technological point of view. There 
>>>> are many works on politics of technology and the debate of 
>>>> participants, decision-makers and the recipients, however I haven't 
>>>> found the same depth in terms of design.
>>>>
>>>> My investigation started with the municipality intervention on the 
>>>> sea transportation in Istanbul that is a vital component of daily 
>>>> life of many people. With the purpose of 'renewal' of a very 
>>>> characteristic transportation means of Istanbul (they are even 
>>>> considered to be 'cultural heritage'), the municipality had planned 
>>>> a drastic change to which some civil groups opposed quite strongly. 
>>>> So as an answer to the resistance, the municipality carried out a 
>>>> sort of online questionare with several design options which was a 
>>>> very lame one in many ways. I don't want to get into details here 
>>>> and rather keep it simple; consequently I ended up asking, is there 
>>>> any way to pursue such an operation that effects public so 
>>>> intensely, in a participative way? Or should the process be 
>>>> participative and democratic anyway? Who are the actors, to what 
>>>> extent and by which way should they be involved?
>>>>
>>>> In my opinion, the question of 'design and democracy' applies to 
>>>> public transportation quite well since it primarily effects society 
>>>> very closely.
>>>> So if you know any references to suggest, I would be very glad...
>>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance and best wishes,
>>>> Gunes Tavmen
>>>> PhD Student, ITU
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Research Assistant
>> Department of Industrial Product Design Istanbul Technical University 
>> Taskisla, Istanbul 34437, Turkey
>>
>> t. 0212 2931310 x 2824
>>
>> f. 0212 2514895
>> w. www.tasarim.itu.edu.tr
>>
>



--
Research Assistant
Department of Industrial Product Design
Istanbul Technical University
Taskisla, Istanbul 34437, Turkey

t. 0212 2931310 x 2824
f. 0212 2514895
w. www.tasarim.itu.edu.tr

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager