I said:
> On reading this formulation, it occurs to me that DCMI
> already has a term that "says" almost exactly this i.e. the
> class dcmitype:Sound.
>
> And in fact, the current definition of dcmitype:Sound even
> captures the notion that there's a capability of a consumer
> involved i.e. "A resource primarily intended to be heard."
So I suppose I'm asking Andrew the question: what is the difference in
"meaning" between an RDF triple saying
Resource:R dc:type dcmitype:Sound .
and an RDF triple saying
Resource:R proposed:accessibility proposed:auditoryOnly .
Pete
---
Pete Johnston
Technical Researcher, Eduserv
[log in to unmask]
+44 (0)1225 474323
http://www.eduserv.org.uk/research/people/petejohnston/
http://efoundations.typepad.com/
|