Dear Fiona,
apart from Bailon (1999) and Böhme (1977) Charissou (1999) and
Engelmann et al. (1985, 124-134) are useful. Engelmann gives criteria
only for Ilium, Sacrum and Frontoparietale, but the drawings are very
instructive.
Refs.:
Charissou, Isabelle (1999): Identification des restes trouvés dans
les pelotes de réjéction de rapaces. – Epops – La revue des
naturalistes du Limousin 44(1), Supplément EPOPS scientifique
Engelmann, Wolf-Eberhard / Fritzsche, Jürgen / Günther, Rainer /
Obst, Fritz Jürgen (1985): Lurche und Kriechtiere Europas, Leipzig
Best
Christian
--
KNOCHENARBEIT
Hans Christian Küchelmann
Diplom-Biologe
Konsul-Smidt-Straße 30, D-28217 Bremen, Germany
tel: +421 - 61 99 177
fax: +421 - 37 83 540
mail: [log in to unmask]
web: http://www.knochenarbeit.de
Am 05.02.2009 um 20:41 schrieb ArchaeoBone:
> Dear Fiona,
>
> Apart from Glastra, Böhme (1977) is good; it's in German but the
> drawings are very clear.
>
> Gottfried Böhme, 1977: Zur Bestimmung quartären Anuren Europas an
> Hand von Skelettelementen, Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der
> Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Mathemathisch-
> Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe 3, 283-299.
>
> Jørn Zeiler
----
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: fiona beglane
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 5:53 PM
> Subject: [ZOOARCH] Frogs and toads
>
> Hello Zooarchers,
> Can anyone give me any information or point me at references to
> distinguish the skeleton of the Natterjack Toad (Bufo calamita)
> from the Common Frog, (Rana temporaria)?
>
> Thank you all in advance
> Fiona
|