I can see your point but this is Type 2 diabetes we're talking about -
how many children affected!? Which is probably why the mean age was 60.4
years...
Angela
-----Original Message-----
From: Clinical biochemistry discussion list
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of David Brown
Sent: 22 January 2009 09:26
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Tight glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes
Of course it is easy to read what you want to believe
in one article.
Perhaps we are looking at the wrong endpoint (HbA1c)
and a case of too late to have any effect (mean age
60.4 years?).
I defy anybody to convince us or the parents of a
diabetic child that tight glusose control is not
effective or not a good thing
David Brown
--- Jonathan Kay <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
------ACB discussion List Information--------
This is an open discussion list for the academic and clinical
community working in clinical biochemistry.
Please note, archived messages are public and can be viewed
via the internet. Views expressed are those of the individual and
they are responsible for all message content.
ACB Web Site
http://www.acb.org.uk
List Archives
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN.html
List Instructions (How to leave etc.)
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/
------ACB discussion List Information--------
This is an open discussion list for the academic and clinical
community working in clinical biochemistry.
Please note, archived messages are public and can be viewed
via the internet. Views expressed are those of the individual and
they are responsible for all message content.
ACB Web Site
http://www.acb.org.uk
List Archives
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN.html
List Instructions (How to leave etc.)
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/
|