Dear David
Of course not all (most) and of course not necessarily (usually). It is
the distinctions that I am looking for. That is, the move to theory is
an uncommon one.
cheers
keith
>>> David Sless <[log in to unmask]> 9/24/2008 11:10 am >>>
On 20/09/2008, at 12:41 PM, Keith Russell wrote:
> The unexpected points to the need for some way of addressing new
> information (to put form into),
In some cases, yes. In other cases the unexpected transforms what we
think about existing information in new ways.
I think more than techne is involved here.
> The invisible research is possibly an even better example of tools
> etc.
Again, not necessarily. A newly articulated rule can lead to
possibilities that were not part of the practice they emerged from.
David
--
blog: www.communication.org.au/dsblog
web: http://www.communication.org.au
Professor David Sless BA MSc FRSA
CEO * Communication Research Institute *
* helping people communicate with people *
Mobile: +61 (0)412 356 795
Phone: +61 (0)3 9489 8640
60 Park Street * Fitzroy North * Melbourne * Australia * 3068
|