Sigh. I'll see what I can determine about what RDA has in mind for
that. It's not intuitively obvious from the documentation I have what
the plan is. It will take a bit of time, I'm afraid, since I'm off to a
family wedding tomorrow and the US has a holiday on Monday (Labor Day).
Diane
Pete Johnston wrote:
> ===
> In addition, as Andrew has pointed out, the Collections
> AP has already declared a property corresponding to the Libraries AP
> element for location:
> http://dublincore.org/groups/collections/collection-application-profile/2007-03-09/#colcldisLocatedAt
> ===
>
> Note that, for better or for worse, the domain of the property
>
> http://purl.org/cld/terms/isLocatedAt
>
> is the class dcmitype:Collection, which is a reasonable enough choice for a property created specifically for the description of collections, and not to meet any broader requirements.
>
> So I do not believe that property, as it stands, meets the requirements of the Libraries AP TG (because they want to describe the "locations" of things which are not collections).
>
> Whether there is any possibility of changing that property isn't for me to say.
>
> But as it stands, it seems to me it is not an appropriate candidate for use in the Libraries AP.
>
> Pete
>
>
|