JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for INT-BOUNDARIES Archives


INT-BOUNDARIES Archives

INT-BOUNDARIES Archives


INT-BOUNDARIES@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

INT-BOUNDARIES Home

INT-BOUNDARIES Home

INT-BOUNDARIES  July 2008

INT-BOUNDARIES July 2008

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Is Pedra Branca a Rock or an Island? And Dokdo/Takeshima?

From:

"Kwiatkowska, Barbara" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Kwiatkowska, Barbara

Date:

Thu, 24 Jul 2008 13:50:25 +0200

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (186 lines)

This email is accessible via: July 2008 at:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=int-boundaries&T=0 :

Regarding Hamzah Ishak's question of 19 June 2008 whether Pedra Branca/Pulau
Batu Puteh is a Rock under UNCLOS 121(3) or an Island under UNCLOS
121(1)-(2), please see the current as hottest as fascinating debates:

With respect to
http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=3&code=masi&case=130&k=2b
Malaysia/Singapore Judgment of 23 May 2008 and UN:
http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=26780&Cr=icj&Cr1 via:
http://www.un.org/apps/news/subject.asp?SubjectID=8 via:
http://www.un.org/news/ and ASIL ILIB of 3 June 2008 at:
http://www.asil.org/ilib/2008/06/ilib080603.htm via:
http://www.asil.org/ilib/ilibarch.htm and Singapore MFA at:
http://www.mfa.gov.sg/pedraBranca/ via: http://www.mfa.gov.sg [old at:
http://internet-stg1.mfa.gov.sg/internet/press/malaysia.htm] and Press
Comments at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7416473.stm &
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedra_Branca_dispute &
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedra_Branca%2C_Singapore
please see the latest news [via:
http://search.news.yahoo.com/search/news?p=ICJ &
http://search.news.yahoo.com/search/news?p=Malaysia &
http://www.channelnewsasia.com/asiapacific/index.htm &
http://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/index.htm]:
Singapore TS/EEZ Claim Is An Act of Provocation of 24 July 2008 at:
http://malaysianinsider.com/index.php/headlines/42/2076 &
http://www.nst.com.my/Thursday/Frontpage/2301672/Article/index_html &
http://www.nst.com.my/Thursday/Frontpage/2301670/Article/index_html &
http://www.nst.com.my/Current_News/NST/Thursday/Columns/2300890/Article/inde
x_html and Malaysia Furious at Singapore's TS/EEZ Unilateral Claim of 22/23
July 2008 at:
http://www.nst.com.my/Current_News/NST/Wednesday/Frontpage/2300818/Article/i
ndex_html &
http://www.straitstimes.com/Latest+News/S-E+Asia/STIStory_260511.html &
http://politickler.com/posts/pedras-getting-bigger/ &
http://www.bernama.com/bernama/v3/news_lite.php?id=348007
Malaysia Does Not Give In to Singapore of 15 July 2008 at:
http://www.bernama.com/bernama/v3/news_lite.php?id=346056 &
http://malaysia.news.yahoo.com/bnm/20080714/tts-parliament-singapore-3-kuala
-lumpur-993ba14.html

There are the best leading international Counsel involved on Malaysia and
Singapore sides, so they will certainly find the way to balance between
contradicting, delicate and masterly vague arguments [requiring careful
studying of excellent! Oral Proceedings at:
http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=3&code=masi&case=130&k=2b]
on what are the legal criteria for identifying UNCLOS 121(3) Rock? It could
be noted that similar controversies are currently surrounding
Dokdo/Takeshima/Liancourt Rocks [at:
http://www.mofat.go.kr/english/main/index.jsp?lang=eng# &
http://www.mofa.go.jp/index.html & http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dokdo &
http://www.america.gov/world/easia.html], where South Korea [at:
http://www.un.org/sg/] decided to enhance habitability (restricted now to 2
civilians and 50 policemen) by setting up a maritime science research
center, digging wells to self-produce potable water, giving wider access to
the public, developing tourism (through building a marine hotel and other
means), holding military exercises near to the disputed islets and applying
for their UNESCO World Heritage Site status.
See via: http://search.news.yahoo.com/search/news?p=Dokdo &
http://search.news.yahoo.com/search/news?p=Takeshima : Condoleezza's Trip
to Middle East, Asia & Pacific on 20-28 July 2008 at:
http://www.state.gov/secretary/trvl/2008/107159.htm [via:
http://www.state.gov/] and South Korea Cautious of 22 July 2008 at:
http://www.asianewsnet.net/news.php?id=384&sec=1 and Japan Calls for Calm of
22 July 2008 at:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080722/wl_nm/japan_korea_islands_dc_1 and
Koreans Outraged by Japan's Claim of 21 July at:
http://news.newamericamedia.org/news/view_article.html?article_id=45e052606a
c8e7b512451d8eedd6fed2&from=rss
South Korea Presses Claims of 20/21 July 2008 at:
http://www.asianewsnet.net/news.php?id=363&sec=1 &
http://www.upi.com/Top_News/2008/07/20/South_Korea_presses_claims_to_Dokdo_i
slets/UPI-28001216595624/ and South Korea Accuses Japan of 20 July 2008 at:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20080720/wl_asia_afp/skoreajapandiplomacydispute
_080720061324 and Seoul Rejects Tokyo's Proposal for Talks of 18 July at:
http://english.vietnamnet.vn/international/2008/07/794310/ and Islands Row
Deflates Condom Sales Drive in South Korea of 17/18 July 2008 at:
http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/storypage.aspx?StoryId=125644 &
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7511065.stm &
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080717/od_uk_nm/oukoe_uk_korea_japan_condoms_1
and South Korea Steps Up Pressure of 16 July 2008 at:
http://www.asianewsnet.net/news.php?id=290&sec=1 &
http://www.bernama.com/bernama/v3/news_lite.php?id=346531 &
http://english.aljazeera.net/news/asia-pacific/2008/07/20087183593714312.htm
l and Seoul to Ask Russia to Relabel Sea of Japan into East Sea on Maps of
16 July 2008 at:
http://en.rian.ru/world/20080716/114112519.html and South Korea to Recall
Its Ambassador to Japan over Dokdo/Takeshima of 14 July 2008 at:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7504933.stm

My best regards,

Barbara

The enclosed IBRU e-mails are at:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A1=ind0806&L=int-boundaries via:
June 2008 at:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=int-boundaries&T=0 [See also
IBRU emails reprinted in my 15 July 2008 email at:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A2=ind0807&L=int-boundaries&T=0&F
=&S=&P=181 via: July 2008 at:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A0=int-boundaries&T=0]

-----Original Message-----
From: International boundaries discussion list
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of hamzah ishak
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 17:28
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [IBRU] Pedra Branca is a rock and not as Island?

I'm wondering if we can agree that Pedra Branca (Pulau Batu Puteh) are
rocks and not islands. Simply because there is no vegetation at least small
crops on those two features. Can this 'island' sustain human habitation?

Please give comments.

Thank you,

Hamzah
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]

-----Original Message-----
From: International boundaries discussion list
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of David Anderson
[[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 14:19
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [INT-BOUNDARIES] Reef vs Island

Dear Paul Ure and Colleagues,

There is a difference between Rockall and some of the other features
mentioned in that the claim to measure an EEZ from Rockall [at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rockall] was abandoned in 1997 upon accession
to the LOS Convention in view of the terms of article 121(3).
I am not at all expert in appraising the two attached oceandots images (for
which many thanks), but it is not easy to see anything standing above water.

Regards,
David Anderson
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]

-----Original Message-----
From: International boundaries discussion list
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Paul Ure
[[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 10:27
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [INT-BOUNDARIES] Reef vs Island

Dear Colleagues

Further to previous discussion both on and off list on these mid ocean
features, Middleton and Elizabeth reefs [see Victor Prescott, The
Uncertainties of Middleton and Elizabeth
Reefs at:
http://www.dur.ac.uk/resources/ibru/publications/full/bsb6-1_prescott.pdf]
must surely rank alongside Rockall, the Spratleys, Okinotorishima and others
when studies are conducted on the impact and influence of low lying
elevations in generating full and extended EEZ's.

After viewing each of them at the referenced URL's consider the
question:
'What does make an island?' or more particularily 'What makes these
islands?'
http://www.oceandots.com/pacific/elizmid/elizabeth.htm
http://www.oceandots.com/pacific/elizmid/middleton2.htm

Regards

Paul Ure
Paul Ure [mailto:[log in to unmask]]

Prof. Dr. Barbara Kwiatkowska
Professor of International Law of the Sea
Deputy Director NILOS
Faculty of Law - Utrecht University
Achter Sint Pieter 200
3512 HT Utrecht - The Netherlands
Phone: 31 30 253 7037/7038
Fax: 31 30 253 7073
http://www.law.uu.nl/nilos
E-mail: [log in to unmask]

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager