Exactly. That would take the burden off of your guys. We all know
that you have more important things to worry about without digging up
references. If it's going into documentation, then I wouldn't worry
too much about putting it into the program.
J
On Jun 25, 2008, at 1:09 PM, Wayne Boucher wrote:
> Sounds like a good idea. (So you mean references to the various
> algorithms used here, there and everywhere.) There is a documentation
> project in the works (led by Chris Spronk) and that should be done
> there I
> guess.
>
> Wayne
>
> On Wed, 25 Jun 2008, Johnny Croy wrote:
>
>> Thanks Wayne....and Tim,
>>
>> Maybe a suggestion so that people don't have to bug you guys about
>> this stuff. Could a info tab be included that contains all of the
>> necessary referencing information for the tools used in analysis?
>>
>> - J
>>
>> On Jun 25, 2008, at 9:02 AM, Wayne Boucher wrote:
>>
>>> Tim says yes but they are sequence adjusted according to:
>>>
>>> Schwarzinger, S., Kroon, G. J. A., Foss, T. R., Chung, J., Wright,
>>> P.
>>> E., Dyson, H.
>>> J.
>>> "Sequence-Dependent Correlation of Random Coil NMR Chemical Shifts",
>>> J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123, 2970-2978 (2001)
>>>
>>> Values obtained from a GGXGG sequence pentapeptide.
>>>
>>> Wayne
>>>
>>> On Wed, 25 Jun 2008, Johnny Croy wrote:
>>>
>>>> Wayne or Tim,
>>>>
>>>> Quick question regarding chemical shift indexing. Where does
>>>> analysis
>>>> pull the random coil 13Ca chemical shifts from? BMRB? If not, do
>>>> you
>>>> have a reference for where these values come from?
>>>>
>>>> Johnny
>>>>
>>
|