If I can cut-n-paste the settings like the current system then all is
well. If the change helps maintenance then go for it.
Alessandra Forti ([log in to unmask]) wrote:
> Hi Jeremy,
>
> the tables would be just replaced by links to the uploaded files.
> The files would be the same we use already on our systems. It was just
> an idea because everytime style is changed or a parameter is added is
> just easier to re-upload the file than going through all the VOs with in
> the page.
>
>
> cheers
> alessandra
>
> Coles, J (Jeremy) wrote:
> >Hi Alessandra
> >
> >I for one support the idea of simplifying the page provided it remains
> >easy to find the information (not just upload it). The opinion of the
> >site admins who use the page counts more than my opinion... so site
> >admins please comment!
> >
> >Jeremy
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Testbed Support for GridPP member institutes
> >[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Alessandra Forti
> >Sent: 27 March 2008 14:23
> >To: [log in to unmask]
> >Subject: GridPP supported VOs pages
> >
> >Hi,
> >
> >I've updated
> >
> >http://www.gridpp.ac.uk/wiki/GridPP_approved_VOs#Example_site-info.def_e
> >ntries
> >
> >ilc, calice and hone had the worng VOMS server DN.
> >
> >It is one of the most useful pages as far as I'm concerned. However I
> >find the table format a bit cumbersome to maintain. I was wondering if
> >it wouldn't be better to upload directly the vo.d snapshots possibly
> >grouped by VOMS server they belong to rather than maintaining these
> >tables.
> >
> >What do people think about it?
> >
> >cheers
> >alessandra
> >
>
> --
> "Well you'll still need a tray"
|