Would it make it easier for you to apply changes to your favorite VOs if
I did?
cheers
alessandra
Peter Love wrote:
> If I can cut-n-paste the settings like the current system then all is
> well. If the change helps maintenance then go for it.
>
> Alessandra Forti ([log in to unmask]) wrote:
>> Hi Jeremy,
>>
>> the tables would be just replaced by links to the uploaded files.
>> The files would be the same we use already on our systems. It was just
>> an idea because everytime style is changed or a parameter is added is
>> just easier to re-upload the file than going through all the VOs with in
>> the page.
>>
>>
>> cheers
>> alessandra
>>
>> Coles, J (Jeremy) wrote:
>>> Hi Alessandra
>>>
>>> I for one support the idea of simplifying the page provided it remains
>>> easy to find the information (not just upload it). The opinion of the
>>> site admins who use the page counts more than my opinion... so site
>>> admins please comment!
>>>
>>> Jeremy
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Testbed Support for GridPP member institutes
>>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Alessandra Forti
>>> Sent: 27 March 2008 14:23
>>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>> Subject: GridPP supported VOs pages
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I've updated
>>>
>>> http://www.gridpp.ac.uk/wiki/GridPP_approved_VOs#Example_site-info.def_e
>>> ntries
>>>
>>> ilc, calice and hone had the worng VOMS server DN.
>>>
>>> It is one of the most useful pages as far as I'm concerned. However I
>>> find the table format a bit cumbersome to maintain. I was wondering if
>>> it wouldn't be better to upload directly the vo.d snapshots possibly
>>> grouped by VOMS server they belong to rather than maintaining these
>>> tables.
>>>
>>> What do people think about it?
>>>
>>> cheers
>>> alessandra
>>>
>> --
>> "Well you'll still need a tray"
>
--
"Well you'll still need a tray"
|