medieval-religion: Scholarly discussions of medieval religion and culture
George R. Hoelzeman wrote:
> medieval-religion: Scholarly discussions of medieval religion and
> culture
>
> On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 12:42:21 -0500, Christopher Crockett wrote:
> snip
>> i've not lost my Faith that both catagories are, essentially, Modren
>> Constructs which are only loosly applicable to Middevil Realities
>> and, as such, are consistently mis-used by most art hysterians --as
>> well as many others in other disciplines who, at least, have an
>> Excuse.
>> snip
>> c
>
>> **********************************************************************
>
> This is an intriguing comment since it is what I used to try drilling
> into my students, that these terms excessively pigeonhole stylistic
> developments that (in spite of 1144) are not as absolutely demarked
> as many seem to think.
>
> My question: what term would you recommend to describe the eras (if
> any) and - short of doing highly focused regional studies - how would
> you see the ideal presentation of the period?
First Pointed, Second Pointed, Third Pointed?
John Briggs
**********************************************************************
To join the list, send the message: join medieval-religion YOUR NAME
to: [log in to unmask]
To send a message to the list, address it to:
[log in to unmask]
To leave the list, send the message: leave medieval-religion
to: [log in to unmask]
In order to report problems or to contact the list's owners, write to:
[log in to unmask]
For further information, visit our web site:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/medieval-religion.html
|