not a moment too soon and thank you K for your providing the opportunity to 
respond tho the idea of preparing to enjoy an evening of preparing to enjoy 
a lovely meal and the pleasure of others' real actual human palpable company 
must be delayed for the purposes of writing a longish post not even 
marginally related to the meaning of the post if that were possible in this 
particular case of the previous poster who seems unable to manage more than 
one word.  work at it K so that at least you give me the chance to +not+ 
respond with relativeness of meaning.  for goodness sake the idea of 
forsaking day-old lamb mince and parsnips in favor of this response is 
utterly tragic.  even mint and chocolate ice cream must be set aside for 
this dithered nattering poetry-related post.  alas i'll simply need to 
provide the listmembers with hundreds and hundreds of recycled revisions of 
my awesomely spectacular dogs short for doggerel.

I repeat:  I think therefore iamb.  and other such stuff as will fill the 
darlinglittle pockets of digest as will qualify my quotidian oh hell with 
the spelling of quotidian quota for the day.

I may be weakening due to the Force of Kasper oh for goodness' sakes, can I 
allow a mere child to turn me off the game of plenitudinous 
outpostings????????????????!!!!!!!! no no wait my Psychic Orphan which 
resides somewhere near the lamb mince and petit pois tells me that Kasper is 
a person of mean age and much means which means he may be  oh fooey it's 
time to time the steaming broccoli.  later K.

your dilatory but dignified doxy-friend J just one letter before yours which 
is K.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "kasper salonen" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 7:12 PM
Subject: Re: to the attention of the List


> what
>
> On 02/11/2007, Judy Prince <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> oh egad the troublesomeness of it all what with my being a stubborn one 
>> and
>> all, now not only will I hafta up my quota to 2-4 posts a day, but I'll
>> hafta exceed that in order to feel free and truly poetically
>> individualistic - say 12 to 14 posts a day.  And these should be longish
>> posts, chock fulla stuff that only my Inner Poet would want to read and 
>> that
>> no one would understand anyway.  Niverth'less, I will try oh I will try 
>> to
>> cooperate in that spirit we all know as refusing to knuckle under to
>> authority no matter how gentle the authority comes on.  I am woman hear 
>> me
>> roar!
>>
>> and certainly +this+ post will not count toward my quota.
>>
>> Judy Pooh Bear of the last lot of obnoxious posters who mourns her lack 
>> of
>> sympathetic company and now hard at work making inconsequential, silly 
>> posts
>> that bear no logical relationship to other posters' posts.  I'll simply
>> hafta put my sheaf of pregnantly reproducing and nubile poems aside . . . 
>> .
>> oh pore tragic creature that I am!
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Anny Ballardini" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 7:39 AM
>> Subject: to the attention of the List
>>
>>
>> >
>> > Could people limit their posts to a maximum of two to four per day?
>> >
>> >
>>
>