Dear All,
Since some of the list members were interested to see the responses, hereby,
I share with you an assemblage of all responses made by contributors. I'd
like to express my gratitude to the contributors for their useful
information.
Thank you very much,
Mohammad
Contributors: Juris Milestone; Alun Price; Terence Love; Charles Burnette;
Ken Friedman, Thomas McPeek; Rob Curedale
1) The American Institute of Architecture Students did a study of studio
culture that you may want to look at: http://www.aias.org/studioculture/
2) Anthony, K. H. (1991). Design juries on trial: the renaissance of the
design studio. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
3) A strong tradition of studio-based education also exists in other fields
of tertiary design education such as engineering design,
software/programming design, and various social systems design such as
business case design and virtual organization design. There is potential for
learning from these for improving studio culture in art and design fields.
Many of these other design fields took existing models of (art and design)
studio as their starting points and developed them. There are literatures on
all of them found under the relevant discipline headings. There is also
material found in areas such as 'problem-based learning', 'project-based
learning', ' case-based reasoning/teaching/learning'.
4) Porter, W. L., & Kilbridge, M. (Eds.). (1981). Architecture Education
Study (Vol. I & II). New York: Andrew W. Mellon Foundation.
5) Goldschmidt, G. (2002). One-on-one: a pedagogical basis for design
instruction in the studio. Paper presented at the Common Ground: Design
Research Society Conference, Brunel University, Stoke on Trent, UK.
6) Journal of Architectural Education (1947-1974), Vol. 28, No. 1/2, Part 2.
1974 AIA/ACSA Teacher's Seminar Pedagogical Catalogue. (1974) = A
Pedagogical Catalog published by the American Collegiate Schools of
Architecture (ACSA); a national survey of the concerns and interests of
architectural educators in their Journal of Architectural Education in 1974.
(Pedagogical Catalogue consists of 58 papers).
7) http://www.idesignthinking.com <http://www.idesignthinking.com/>
8) Friedman, K. (1997). Design Science and Design Education. In P. McGrory
(Ed.), The Challenge of Complexity (pp. 54-72). Helsinki: University of Art
and Design Helsinki UIAH.
9) Friedman, K. (2002). Towards an integrative design discipline. In S. E.
Squires & B. Byrne (Eds.), Creating Breakthrough Ideas: The Collaboration of
Anthropologists and Designers in the Product Development Industry (pp.
200-214). Westport, Connecticut: Bergin and Garvey.
10) Kendall Buster, D., & Crawford, P. (2007). The Critique Handbook: A
Sourcebook and Survival Guide. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson
Prentice Hall.
11) Laves "Situated Learning Theory", Bandura's "Social Learning Theory" and
Vygotsky's "Social Development Theory".
12) Doidge, C., Sara, R., & Parnell, R. (2000). The crit: an architecture
student's handbook. Oxford: Architectural Press.
|