Hi everybody,
On 19 Sep 2007, at 15:51, Colm G. Connolly wrote:
> In either case the data looks like the screen shot you attached to
> your earlier email. Both the LPI and RPI look identical when
> overlaid in fslview.
>
> I had originally thought that LPI would make fsl happier but since
> RPI makes fslorient say "radiological" I'm going to try the RPI
> files and see how things go. It'll be about 3 days before the job
> completes.
So I made the modifications to the data and re-ran my job and things
seem, to my untrained eye, to be much better. Though since I've never
seen this type of data before I'm not sure. I'd very much appreciate
if someone more familiar with this type of analysis could have a look
over the files and let me know what they think of them.
I've been looking at the GM_mod_merge.nii.gz file and have notices a
region of higher intensity which seems to migrate in a posterior to
anterior direction as you go through the slices in the file. Is this
a problem? What causes it?
The file is at https://tcin.tchpc.tcd.ie/vbm/good along with the
template_4D_GM.nii.gz.
Thanks,
--
Dr Colm G. Connolly
School of Psychology and Institute of Neuroscience
The Lloyd Building
University of Dublin
Trinity College, Dublin 2, Éire
Tel: +353-1-896-8475
Fax: +353-1-671-3183
|