Hi,
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 07:25:43AM +0100, Steve Smith wrote:
> Hi - it's probably worth having a look at the Debian FSL packages at:
> http://apsy.gse.uni-magdeburg.de/main/index.psp?sec=1&page=hanke/fsl&lang=en
> Cheers.
>
> On 24 Sep 2007, at 09:58, Thomas Sattler wrote:
>
>> Hi there ...
>>
>> I'm trying to compile fsl-4.0.1 but ". ${FSLDIR}/etc/fslconf/fsl.sh"
>> returns a bad FSLMACHTYPE
>>
>> "gcc -dumpmachine" returns "i486-linux" which is split in
>>
>> gcc_cpu_type=i486
>> gcc_os_vendor=linux
>> gcc_os_name=
>>
>> This results in FSLMACHTYPE="_32-gcc3.3"
>>
>> Compilation is done on a x86_64 debian sarge box, but within a chroot
>> (debian sarge, 32Bit) as the resulting binaries are made for 32bit
>> diskless compute nodes.
You'll probably have a hard time compiling FSL for sarge. A number of
it's dependencies are pretty outdated. Escpecially VTK will be a pain to
backport, partly because of the changes in the Python packaging policy.
As a start, you could take the Debian package and disable the
compilation of FSLView in debian/rules. You'll probably have to relax
the build-dependencies in debian/control to deal with the sarge
versions. It can easily happen that you have to backport/recompile a
lot of packages. In the end there might be not much left of sarge.
Any chance you can upgrade your nodes to etch?
Good luck,
Michael
--
GPG key: 1024D/3144BE0F Michael Hanke
http://apsy.gse.uni-magdeburg.de/hanke
ICQ: 48230050
|