I suggest that is the modern, dependable NHS for you.
On 10/08/07, Saul Galloway <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I just wanted to run a theoretical case past my esteemed colleagues for an
> opinion.
>
> Say a PBC had agreed and minuted at a properly constituted locality board
> meeting last FY that they would distribute some 800k of money allocated to
> practice development/improvement grants. The money was to have been
> allocated on a capitation basis and practices were instructed to invoice at
> the end of the 06/07 FY. For the sake of argument say that the money was
> agreed to be distributed as part of the formal PBC budget setting
> methodology, and that practices formally signed acceptance of their budgets.
>
> If that PCT then merged (say) and the new bigger PCT organisation (say) was
> overspent and expressed regret but declined to honour that commitment due to
> financial constraints, would there be any recourse for the practices?
>
> All purely theoretically of course :-/
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> This message may contain confidential and privileged information.
> If you are not the intended recipient please accept our apologies.
> Please do not disclose, copy or distribute information in this e-mail
> or take any action in reliance on its contents: to do so is strictly
> prohibited and may be unlawful. Please inform us that this message has
> gone astray before deleting it. Thank you for your co-operation.
>
> NHSmail is used daily by over 100,000 staff in the NHS. Over a million
> messages are sent every day by the system. To find out why more and
> more NHS personnel are switching to this NHS Connecting for Health
> system please visit www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/nhsmail
> **********************************************************************
>
|