JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for RADSTATS Archives


RADSTATS Archives

RADSTATS Archives


RADSTATS@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

RADSTATS Home

RADSTATS Home

RADSTATS  August 2007

RADSTATS August 2007

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

The 2011 Census

From:

ScienceSources <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

ScienceSources <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 15 Aug 2007 16:11:30 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (187 lines)

Dear Roy and RadStats members

I think that all those who have expressed concern about Lockheed Martin and
their possible involvement with the UK Census are absolutely right to be
worried. The major military corporations, like Lockheed and BAE Systems,
are involved with a variety of research and teaching activities both in the
UK and USA and are very close indeed to the cabinet level of both country's
governments.

The questions around the security and commercial use of an individual's data
are of the gravest importance when one follows the paths between 'security'
databases in both countries and the erosion of privacy and basic rights
which are underway under the pretence of 'terrorism'. Activities not open to
public scrutiny or discussion. The provision of global databases containing
a variety of information are already being built and will be enhanced if
Lockheed Martin gets involved with the UK Census. I think that this
development must be challenged where ever we can in our professional and
special interest groups. The USA monitors UK e-mails and telephone
conversations from its installations at Menwith Hill - a site that is not
answerable to the UK government - and having more data
about the UK population would further lessen the independence of the UK. As
others have pointed out the US government would I think clearly feel that
data collected by Lockheed Martin was legitimate 'intelligence' for its own
wellbeing and let's not worry about privacy or freedom.

For some further information about Lockheed Martin and its involvement with
UK science and technology see Soldiers in the laboratory on www.sgr.org.uk

Chris Langley
Scientists for Global Responsibility

----- Original Message -----
From: "R.Thomas" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 2:50 PM
Subject: The 2011 Census


That reference by Paul Bivand provides a lot of interesting information.

As I recall it at the same stage of the 2001 census the ONS was proclaiming
the importance of public consultation. And it appeared that everything was
up for consultation except the idea of a One-Number Census. The One-Number
idea failed dismally. Now it appears that the consultation has been
replaced by the idea of paying suppliers to organise the census. With no
mention of public consultation.

That my be a very 'rational' solution, but I share Janet Shapiro's unease at
Lockheed Martin becoming a major supplier. The 'war on terror' has seems
to have impelled a number of US organizations to suspend any commitment to
what were widely accepted moral principles. A firm like Lockheed Martin
would ignore clauses of confidentialy in a Census contract with the UK
Government if it could find any justification in terms of the defence of
the US.

The contractual relationship between a supplier and the Government will also
make it more difficult to get information on the activities of suppliers.
They will plead that they cannot give information because it would give
advantages to their competitors.

Ray Thomas, Faculty of Social Sciences, Open University
******************************************************




-----Original Message-----
From: email list for Radical Statistics [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of Paul Bivand
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 5:14 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Lockheed Martin shortlisted for Census


The answer to John Whittington's question may be on this National Statistics
page
http://www.statistics.gov.uk/census/2011census/collectingtheinfo/workingsuppliers.asp.

Looks like there are only two contractors in place to bid for the data
capture and associated systems work - one of which is Lockheed Martin.


---------------------------------------------------------
Paul Bivand
Head of Analysis and Statistics
Direct Line: 020 7840 8335

Inclusion
3rd floor, 89 Albert Embankment, London SE1 7TP
Tel: 020 7582 7221
Fax: 020 7582 6391
Inclusion website: www.cesi.org.uk

The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are intended solely for
the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient please
return the e-mail to the sender and delete from your mailbox. The contents
of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are intended solely for the use of the
addressee.

-----Original Message-----
From: email list for Radical Statistics [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of John Whittington
Sent: 14 August 2007 14:38
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Lockheed Martin shortlisted for Census

At 13:41 14/08/07 +0100, Janet Shapiro wrote (in small part):

>Lockheed Martin is one of the shortlisted contractors to provide data
>capture and storage services for the 2011 Census, .... ......The
>petition - to be found at the url below - is worded as follows: "We the
>undersigned petition the Prime Minister to stop the involvement of arms
>company Lockheed Martin in the 2011 Census for England and Wales,
>Northern Ireland and Scotland, because this company's history of
>working in American military intelligence will undermine public
>confidence in the Census process."

Janet, are you in a position to share with us the identities of the other
shortlisted contractors, in order that we might attempt to judge their
relative merits/demerits, rather than pass judgment on one of them out of
that context?

Kind Regards,


John

----------------------------------------------------------------
Dr John Whittington, Voice: +44 (0) 1296 730225
Mediscience Services Fax: +44 (0) 1296 738893
Twyford Manor, Twyford, E-mail: [log in to unmask]
Buckingham MK18 4EL, UK
----------------------------------------------------------------

******************************************************
Please note that if you press the 'Reply' button your message will go only
to the sender of this message. If you want to reply to the whole list, use
your mailer's 'Reply-to-All' button to send your message automatically to
[log in to unmask]
Disclaimer: The messages sent to this list are the views of the sender and
cannot be assumed to be representative of the range of views held by
subscribers to the Radical Statistics Group. To find out more about Radical
Statistics and its aims and activities and read current and past issues of
our newsletter you are invited to visit our web site www.radstats.org.uk.
*******************************************************

******************************************************
Please note that if you press the 'Reply' button your
message will go only to the sender of this message.
If you want to reply to the whole list, use your mailer's 'Reply-to-All'
button to send your message automatically to [log in to unmask]
Disclaimer: The messages sent to this list are the views of the sender and
cannot be assumed to be representative of the range of views held by
subscribers to the Radical Statistics Group. To find out more about Radical
Statistics and its aims and activities and read current and past issues of
our newsletter you are invited to visit our web site www.radstats.org.uk.
*******************************************************

--
Я использую бесплатную версию SPAMfighter для частных пользователей.
Программа удалила 81 эл. письма спама, полученные до настоящего времени.
Пользователи платной версии не имеют этого сообщения в их электронных
письмах.
Попробовать:http://www.spamfighter.com/lru

******************************************************
Please note that if you press the 'Reply' button your
message will go only to the sender of this message.
If you want to reply to the whole list, use your mailer's
'Reply-to-All' button to send your message automatically
to [log in to unmask]
Disclaimer: The messages sent to this list are the views of the sender and
cannot be assumed to be representative of the range of views held by
subscribers to the Radical Statistics Group. To find out more about Radical
Statistics and its aims and activities and read current and past issues of
our newsletter you are invited to visit our web site www.radstats.org.uk.
*******************************************************

******************************************************
Please note that if you press the 'Reply' button your
message will go only to the sender of this message.
If you want to reply to the whole list, use your mailer's
'Reply-to-All' button to send your message automatically
to [log in to unmask]
Disclaimer: The messages sent to this list are the views of the sender and cannot be assumed to be representative of the range of views held by subscribers to the Radical Statistics Group. To find out more about Radical Statistics and its aims and activities and read current and past issues of our newsletter you are invited to visit our web site www.radstats.org.uk.
*******************************************************

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager