Thanks for the distinction Mike. It is indeed
important to distinguish between "automatic" and
"conscious" cognitive processes, and I am more
interested in the latter, which seems rather
neglected.
I remember Bordwell talking about the "missing" key
plot points in "Tokyo Story", but it was more in terms
of POV, than audience reception. I don't seem to
recall any writing that deals with the latter example.
One exception is the usage of Gestalt theory (rule of
closure) in films. Also, the use of offscreen sound is
discussed, but not really along the lines of audience
cognition.
--- "Frank, Michael" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> thinking about catalin's provocative questions, i
> find myself wondering
> particularly about one detail . . . catalin asks
> both for examples and
> for theoretical treatments of a number of cinematic
> elements including
> "- the omission of key narrative plot points, so
> that the audience
> 'fills in the gaps' " - and i think that even
> beginning to address the
> question requires a preliminary distinction . . .
>
>
>
> that's because every narrative, however rudimentary
> and however small
> the event that it narrates, always leaves out
> certain details . . .
> every sequence that does not take place in real time
> obviously leaves
> out moments; when we see the protagonist get into a
> red sedan in the
> country in shot one, and get out of what looks like
> the same red sedan
> on a city street in shot two, we take it for granted
> that she travelled
> the distance between the two spots but we were not
> shown the trip . . .
> even the simplest declarative sentence [e.g., "i had
> a cup of coffee"]
> leaves out central details [that the drinker picked
> up the cup in his
> hand], details that the reader or viewer
> automatically supplies . . .
>
>
>
> now these are, i suspect, not among those narrative
> elements that
> catalin would consider "key plot points" - but they
> nonetheless depend
> on an audience protocol of filling in gaps . . .
> this seems to me a very
> different cognitive process than one that requires
> the audience to solve
> a puzzle at it were . . . for in the former cases
> the audience has no
> sense of there being a problem to solve, so
> automatic is the gap-filling
> . . . in the latter cases there is a process of
> something we might call
> imaginative projection, quite missing from the
> former - and thus,
> speaking as a novice in these matters, it seems to
> me that the filling
> in of these gaps, gaps that leave out key narrative
> plot points, is less
> a perceptual process and more of a conceptual
> process, and that it is
> essentially a willed act and quite far from
> automatic
>
>
>
> i'm not entirely sure how relevant this distinction
> may be in the long
> run, but the work in cognitive approaches that i'm
> familiar with seems
> to lean heavily on the perceptual and not the
> conceptual
>
>
>
> am interested in hearing what others make of this
> distinction
>
>
>
> mike
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Film-Philosophy journal:
> http://www.film-philosophy.com
>
> Contact: [log in to unmask]
>
> **
>
>
> *
> *
> Film-Philosophy salon
> After hitting 'reply' please always delete the text
> of the message you are replying to.
> To leave, send the message: leave film-philosophy
> to: [log in to unmask]
> Or visit:
> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/film-philosophy.html
> For help email:
> [log in to unmask], not the
> salon.
> *
> Film-Philosophy journal:
> http://www.film-philosophy.com
> Contact: [log in to unmask]
> **
>
>
>
____________________________________________________________________________________Ready for the edge of your seat?
Check out tonight's top picks on Yahoo! TV.
http://tv.yahoo.com/
*
*
Film-Philosophy salon
After hitting 'reply' please always delete the text of the message you are replying to.
To leave, send the message: leave film-philosophy to: [log in to unmask]
Or visit: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/film-philosophy.html
For help email: [log in to unmask], not the salon.
*
Film-Philosophy journal: http://www.film-philosophy.com
Contact: [log in to unmask]
**
|