JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for RADSTATS Archives


RADSTATS Archives

RADSTATS Archives


RADSTATS@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

RADSTATS Home

RADSTATS Home

RADSTATS  June 2007

RADSTATS June 2007

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Social mobility

From:

Paul Lambert <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Paul Lambert <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 27 Jun 2007 09:09:29 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (138 lines)

(But the original subject line of this mail was 'Re: Message from
'listowner''). 


Allan Reese wrote: 

> How about a statistical discussion based on:
> * UK educational attainment has risen in recent decades
> * UK social mobility has decreased in recent decades
> * education is the key to social mobility (David Cameron, 
> interview 25 June 2007).  




It's not completely clear which of the statements above are being
asserted, and which are being mocked! 

I'm sure most on this list will recognise that the issue of trends in
educational effects hinges on the distribution of educational
attainments within generations (e.g. school leaving cohorts). 

To compare, for example, with an analogy from Cricket (I know the below
isn't factually spot on, but it will do..)

The England team's one-day runs averages continue to rise
The England's team's international one-day ranking continues to fall
The England coach insists the key to one-day success is scoring runs

What a fool the coach is (that last statement _is_ intended to be mocked
- obviously, runs remain key, it's just that you must also account for
the number of other teams' runs..).  

I'm sure the poster is probably aware of all this, but stated as above,
David Cameron's conclusions are not necessarily out of step: education
could still be critical to helping individuals achieve 'social mobility'
(it would just depend on how it is directed). 

In fact, sociologists often analyse longer term trends in the effects of
education, but very rarely by standardising within the distribution of
the relevant generation (e.g. school leaving cohorts). They should - but
there are only a couple of applications that I know of that have done
this is, one being: 

Harman, J., Graham, H., Francis, B., & Inskip, H. M. (2006).
Socioeconomic gradients in smoking among young women: A British survey.
Social Science and Medicine, 63(11), 2791-2780.


Then, there's another very problematic statement in the claims above,
the assertion that social mobility has decreased in recent decades. 

I've heard this statement repeated ad nauseum over the last few years.
I've noted details of speeches were David Cameron, Tony Blair and Ruth
Kelly (when education minister) have all asserted this. I've heard
countless media commentaries on the 'collapsing' of social mobility in
Britain; even just this morning, the so-called decline in social
mobility in Britain was the subject of a 10 minute special investigation
on Radio 4.. 

All of this is important because it ignores critical but somewhat
inconvenient empirical evidence: social mobility has increased steadily
(though only very slightly) in Britain over the last 200 years, and it
continues to increase. I'm convinced of this myself, because I worked on
and off for 5 years on the analysis of social mobility trends with
colleagues, through the meta-analysis of 32 micro-social datasets - we
wrote our findings up at: 

Lambert, P. S., Prandy, K., & Bottero, W. (2007). By Slow Degrees: Two
Centuries of Social Reproduction and Mobility in Britain. Sociological
Research Online, 12(1). http://www.socresonline.org.uk/12/1/prandy.html

It's true that there is a lot of debate in sociology over social
mobility trends, but most recent publications have concluded either no
significant change in social mobility over time, or a small increase. To
my knowledge, it is only one recent group of studies, by Blanden et al
(see above for citations and discussion) which claim otherwise, that
social mobility has declined. These are very sound studies, but I'm
convinced that they are misleading about the nature of longer term
trends in social mobility, because they focus on income mobility from
very recent cohorts. These studies nevertheless have been tremendously
influential. In my view because they tell a version of events that many
like to hear for political motivations, regardless of any contrary
evidence - a salad bar model for choosing research evidence to suit your
views, perhaps on a par with other great misrepresentations of evidence
such as MMR and autism....


Paul


--
Dr Paul S. Lambert
Department of Applied Social Science (Rm 3S16) 
Stirling University 

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: email list for Radical Statistics 
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Allan Reese (Cefas)
> Sent: 25 June 2007 11:16
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Message from 'listowner'
> 
> I agree with the listowner, having deleted several messages 
> each day for the past week.  
> 
> How about a statistical discussion based on:
> * UK educational attainment has risen in recent decades
> * UK social mobility has decreased in recent decades
> * education is the key to social mobility (David Cameron, 
> interview 25 June 2007).  
> 
> 
> 

-- 
The University of Stirling is a university established in Scotland by
charter at Stirling, FK9 4LA.  Privileged/Confidential Information may
be contained in this message.  If you are not the addressee indicated
in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such
person), you may not disclose, copy or deliver this message to anyone
and any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is
prohibited and may be unlawful.  In such case, you should destroy this
message and kindly notify the sender by reply email.  Please advise
immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email
for messages of this kind.

******************************************************
Please note that if you press the 'Reply' button your
message will go only to the sender of this message.
If you want to reply to the whole list, use your mailer's
'Reply-to-All' button to send your message automatically
to [log in to unmask]
Disclaimer: The messages sent to this list are the views of the sender and cannot be assumed to be representative of the range of views held by subscribers to the Radical Statistics Group. To find out more about Radical Statistics and its aims and activities and read current and past issues of our newsletter you are invited to visit our web site www.radstats.org.uk.
*******************************************************

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager