Another related assumption: "system"
On 3 Apr 2007, at 20:24, Henry Taylor wrote:
> This list of memorable cinematic moments could go on forever. But we'd
> be staying within what Saussure called 'parole': the potentially
> infinite number of utterances which don't reveal the system. How could
> we get to the 'langue' of this, the paradigm, the 'grammar' of these
> moments: what are they? Plot points, reversals, revelations,
> recognitions, inciting moments, hooks, pay-offs, excess,
> parametric.... ?
>
> Any ideas how we could theorize these phenomena?
>
> H
>
>
>
>
>
>> a personal favourite:
>>
>> what's-his-name cramming steve buscemi's remains (more precisely,
>> foot) into
>> a wood-grinder with the help of a log, while blood splashes all over
>> the
>> snowy forest floor as frances mcdormand approaches through the trees,
>> at
>> first not realizing what the sound is, towards the end of Fargo.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> anja
>>
>
> *
> *
> Film-Philosophy Email Discussion Salon.
> After hitting 'reply' please always delete the text of the message you
> are replying to.
> To leave, send the message: leave film-philosophy to:
> [log in to unmask]
> For help email: [log in to unmask], not the salon.
> **
>
*
*
Film-Philosophy Email Discussion Salon.
After hitting 'reply' please always delete the text of the message you are replying to.
To leave, send the message: leave film-philosophy to: [log in to unmask]
For help email: [log in to unmask], not the salon.
**
|