JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for SPACESYNTAX Archives


SPACESYNTAX Archives

SPACESYNTAX Archives


SPACESYNTAX@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SPACESYNTAX Home

SPACESYNTAX Home

SPACESYNTAX  January 2007

SPACESYNTAX January 2007

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Space Syntax and Road Widths

From:

Alan Penn <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:51:31 -0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (80 lines)

Kaveh,

This issue was addressed in part in Penn, A. and Hillier, B. and Banister,
D. and Xu, J. (1998) Configurational modelling of urban movement networks.
Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 25. pp. 59-84.
http://eprints.ucl.ac.uk/archive/00001400/ 

In this research we distinguished between street width (face to face of
buildings) and effective road width (ie. the width open to vehicles
excluding roadside parking etc.). We found that radius integration and
effective road width together accounted for about r^2=.8 in a multiple
regression against flows, but that the same did not hold if we included
street width (face to face of buildings) instead, the contribution of this
variable was much weaker. 

This led to a 'supply-demand' hypothesis: that the demand for flow on a
particular link depends on its place in the network configuration (indexed
in this case by radius integration in the axial map), and that the effective
road width had been engineered over the years to supply road space (width)
according to that demand. Now in central London which operates pretty much
'at capacity' for much of the time that 'engineered' effective width became
a constraining factor in the flows that could be achieved and so became
important in the multiple regression, but we argued that the underlying
demand indexed by radius integration was the primary causal factor. 

More recently Bill and Shinichi have added to this by looking at measures of
angular and metric integration and betweeness in a segment based network (as
well as the original axial or "topological" values) against the same data.
The beauty of this was that a single segment based representation could be
used to measure 'costs' thought of as angular deviation, metric distance and
simply number of decision points (ie. changing from axial line to axial line
is a step of depth as in the original analysis) along a route. They found
that angular and topological measures were strongly related, but that metric
was much less so. This suggested that cognitively metric distance is notthe
key factor in diver navigational decision making but that number of
decisions and angular deviation of the route are much more significant.
Hillier, B. and Iida, S. (2005) Network and psychological effects in urban
movement. In: Cohn, A.G. and Mark, D.M., (eds). Proceedings of Spatial
Information Theory: International Conference, COSIT 2005,Ellicottsville,
N.Y., U.S.A.,September 14-18, 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol.
3693). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, pp. 475-490. 
http://eprints.ucl.ac.uk/archive/00001232/  I don't think that this has then
been tied back to the involvement of street width, but clearly it could be,
and this would be an interesting thing to do. 

By the way, clearly building height, land use and street width may often
have relations among themselves. So, in the original research we also looked
at other factors such as average building height (in floors), ground level
land use etc. and our observations were carried out with an observation gate
at every street segment in the whole of each case study area. These factors
turned out not to be particularly important in the regression against flows
at a segment by segment level of analysis, but did show effects at a 'whole
area' level of aggregated analysis. 

Alan Penn
Professor of Architectural and Urban Computing
The Bartlett School of Graduate Studies
University College London
Gower Street
London WC1E 6BT
+44 (0)20 7679 5919
[log in to unmask]
www.vr.ucl.ac.uk
www.spacesyntax.org
 
> 
> Hi
> 
> I just wonder if you can lead me to any papers on the relation between
> syntax
> measures and road-widths. One might think of it as a by-product of the
> natural
> movement particularly in organically growing urban systems. However, I am
> looking for a rather direct theoretical addressing which will be useful
> for my
> study.
> 
> Thanks
> Kaveh Shafiei

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager