Philip,
This eally a reply to
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006, Philip Hunter wrote:
> I can't really do a better job of describing the Harnad model than Stevan
> has in his own mailings over the past few years. It is a model because there
> are alternatives. Stevan can't (or won't) see alternatives, and argues that
> he is just promoting OA.
>
> Best,
>
> Philip
>
> *********************************
> Philip Hunter
> IRIScotland
> Digital Library Division
> Edinburgh University Library
> George Square, Edinburgh, EH8 9LJ
> Tel: +44 (0)131 651 3768
> *********************************
>>
>> But mandates are not yet universally adopted, and there are arguments for
>> and against. So in this debate, could you elaborate what you consider to
>> be the features of the "Harnad model of scholarly communication" and how
>> it differs from other models?
>> --
>> Les Carr
>>
>
|