 |
 |
Philip, This eally a reply to On Tue, 10 Oct 2006, Philip Hunter wrote: > I can't really do a better job of describing the Harnad model than Stevan > has in his own mailings over the past few years. It is a model because there > are alternatives. Stevan can't (or won't) see alternatives, and argues that > he is just promoting OA. > > Best, > > Philip > > ********************************* > Philip Hunter > IRIScotland > Digital Library Division > Edinburgh University Library > George Square, Edinburgh, EH8 9LJ > Tel: +44 (0)131 651 3768 > ********************************* >> >> But mandates are not yet universally adopted, and there are arguments for >> and against. So in this debate, could you elaborate what you consider to >> be the features of the "Harnad model of scholarly communication" and how >> it differs from other models? >> -- >> Les Carr >> >