Maybe I got carried away a little by my rhetoric. I should talked have about "this deconstructionism" (not "deconstructionism" in general).
Michael
________________________________
From: James Woodcock [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thu 24/08/2006 11:26
To: M Power
Cc: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Deconstructing the evidence-based discourse in health sciences)
Michael,
I think you are too harsh on deconstructionism. Any method can be used badly. I think it is noteworthy that their article was not published in a sociology journal, my guess is that it would not have been accepted.
James
|