The Disability-Research Discussion List

Managed by the Centre for Disability Studies at the University of Leeds

Help for DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives


DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives


DISABILITY-RESEARCH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Home

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Home

DISABILITY-RESEARCH  July 2006

DISABILITY-RESEARCH July 2006

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Landmine Monitor Report 2005--Use of Landmines and Number of Casualties Decrease But Immense Challenges Remain

From:

Frank Hall-Bentick <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Frank Hall-Bentick <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sun, 23 Jul 2006 08:44:17 +1000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (125 lines)

***************************************************************************************
The "Disability Information Dissemination Network" is managed
by the ''Centre for Services and Information on Disability ' '  (CSID), 
Bangladesh
and currently sponsored by Handicap International 
*****************************************************************************************
Landmine Monitor Report 2005--Use of Landmines and Number of Casualties 
Decrease But Immense Challenges Remain

Global use of antipersonnel mines and the number of reported mine 
casualties have fallen, according to the 1,053-page Landmine Monitor Report 
2005--the seventh annual report by the International Campaign to Ban 
Landmines (ICBL). International funding for mine action increased to $399 
million in 2004, and 135 square kilometers of mine-affected land were cleared.

But immense challenges remain. Over 200,000 square kilometers of the world 
are likely contaminated by mines and unexploded ordnance (UXO), and an 
estimated 15,000-20,000 people are maimed or killed by mines and UXO each 
year. The number of landmine survivors needing assistance continues to 
increase.

"At the First Review Conference of the Mine Ban Treaty in November 2004, 
the global community re-affirmed its commitment to eradicating 
antipersonnel mines," said ICBL Ambassador Ms. Jody Williams, who shared 
the 1997 Nobel Peace Prize with the ICBL. "Although we are making great 
strides in our work to rid the world of this weapon, we need to do even 
more. We must continue to transform political commitments into concrete 
action to ensure that antipersonnel mines are removed within the 10-year 
treaty mandated deadline, and to ensure that landmine survivors receive the 
assistance they need," she said.

Since the last Landmine Monitor report, four countries joined the 1997 Mine 
Ban Treaty, including Ethiopia, which is heavily mine-affected, as well as 
Bhutan, Latvia and Vanuatu. There are 147 States Parties to the treaty, and 
an additional seven countries have signed but not yet ratified. Forty 
countries remain outside the treaty, including China, Russia and the United 
States. The Mine Ban Treaty comprehensively prohibits use, production, and 
trade of antipersonnel mines, requires destruction of stockpiled 
antipersonnel mines within four years, and requires clearance of mined 
areas within 10 years.

Use of antipersonnel mines around the world has continued to decrease. 
"Myanmar, Nepal and Russia deserve strong condemnation as the only 
governments to lay antipersonnel mines in 2005," said Stephen Goose of 
Human Rights Watch, Landmine Monitor's Ban Policy Coordinator. In 2004, 
those same three countries used antipersonnel mines and there was also 
strong evidence of use by Georgian forces, though the government denies it.

Non-state armed groups are now the primary users of antipersonnel mines. 
This year's Landmine Monitor Report cites use of antipersonnel mines by 
such groups in 13 countries, compared to 16 in last year's report. Rebel 
use was especially widespread in Colombia, Myanmar (Burma) and Nepal. In a 
positive development, the Polisario Front in Western Sahara agreed to ban 
antipersonnel mines on 3 November 2005.

Landmine Monitor identifies 13 countries as producing or retaining the 
right to produce antipersonnel mines, a dramatic drop from over 50 
mine-producing countries in the past. Egypt and Iraq were removed from the 
list of antipersonnel mine producers in this reporting period, due to new 
statements and information provided by those governments. The virtual 
cessation of global trade in antipersonnel mines has been maintained, as 
Landmine Monitor found no confirmed instances of antipersonnel mine 
transfers in the last year.

Destruction of antipersonnel mine stockpiles by States Parties has rid the 
world of some 400,000 mines since the last Landmine Monitor report. 
Seventy-one States Parties have completed stockpile destruction, including 
Algeria on 21 November 2005. In total, States Parties have destroyed more 
than 38.3 million stockpiled antipersonnel mines. Non-signatories to the 
treaty continue to hold an estimated 160 million stockpiled antipersonnel 
mines.

At least 84 countries are affected by landmines and/or unexploded ordnance, 
of which 54 are States Parties to the Mine Ban Treaty. Countries with the 
largest mine-affected areas include Laos, Vietnam, Iran, Iraq, Cambodia, 
and Bosnia and Herzegovina. In 2004, at least 135 square kilometers of 
mine-affected land were cleared. Afghanistan reported clearance of the 
largest amount of mined land (33.3 square kilometers), followed by Cambodia 
(32 square kilometers). At least 140,000 antipersonnel mines, 50,000 
antivehicle mines, and some 3 million items of UXO were destroyed during 
clearance operations in 2004.

However, some States Parties appear not to be on course to meet their 
treaty-mandated deadlines for clearance of mined areas, including eight of 
the 14 States Parties with 2009 deadlines--Bosnia and Herzegovina, Chad, 
Croatia, Denmark, Niger, Swaziland, Thailand, and the United Kingdom (in 
respect of the Falklands)--as well as Cambodia with a deadline of 1 March 
2010. "Comprehensive national plans and sustained funding are needed to 
ensure that all mine-affected areas are cleared as quickly and efficiently 
as possible," said Ms. Sara Sekkenes of Norwegian People's Aid and Research 
Coordinator for Mine Action.

Mine risk education (MRE) programs expanded in many countries and became 
better integrated with clearance and other mine action activities. Landmine 
Monitor recorded MRE in 61 countries, and 6.25 million people received MRE 
in 2004. No MRE activities were recorded in 25 mine-affected countries. 
"Resources are needed to ensure that MRE programs can continue to target 
those most at-risk from mines and UXO until mine clearance is complete," 
said Andy Wheatley of Handicap International and Research Coordinator for 
Mine Risk Education.

In 2004-2005, new landmine and UXO casualties were reported in 58 countries 
(eight less than the previous reporting period). Landmine Monitor 
identified over 6,521reported new landmine/UXO casualties in 2004, compared 
to 8,065 in 2003. The number of reported new mine and UXO casualties has 
dropped significantly in some mine-affected countries. Given the lack of 
reliable records and under-reporting, Landmine Monitor estimates that there 
are between 15,000 and 20,000 new landmine and UXO casualties each year.

"The number of landmine survivors continues to grow," said Sheree Bailey of 
Handicap International and the Research Coordinator for Victim Assistance. 
"The majority of an estimated 300,000-400,000 landmine survivors need 
ongoing access to medical care and socioeconomic reintegration services, 
and in too many countries these services are desperately inadequate to meet 
growing needs."
The full Landmine Monitor report and related documents are available online 
in various languages at www.icbl.org/lm/2005. Please email [log in to unmask] for 
the password.

________________End of message______________________
This Disability-Research Discussion list is managed by the Centre for Disability Studies at the University of Leeds (www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies). Enquiries about the list administratione should be sent to [log in to unmask]
Archives and tools are located at:
www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html
You can JOIN or LEAVE the list from this web page.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager