Andrew:
I'm not comfortable about the fact that this wording suggests using a
" ... widely-recognized syntax (e.g., ...) without recognizing that
these syntaxes are named things and should be specified in the
metadata.
Diane
>Tom et al
>
>I've been looking at the DCMES changes docs and re-read an email
>(http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A2=ind0507&L=dc-date&T=0&P=4025)
>from the DC-Date working group proposing a new comment for Date. That
>proposed text is different from the text I recently proposed. I'm thinking
>that perhaps we need to use this version, since we did ask the Date WG to
>draft it. This is what the WG agreed (11-0):
>
>"Typically, Date will be associated with the creation or availability of
>the resource. A date value may be a single date or a date range. Date
>values may express temporal information at any level of granularity
>(including time). Recommended best practice for encoding the date value
>is to supply an unambiguous representation of the single date or date
>range using a widely-recognized syntax (e.g., YYYY-MM-DD for a single
>date; YYYY-MM-DD/YYYY-MM-DD for a date range; YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM to
>specify a single date and time down to the minute)."
>
>The Madrid meeting notes say that we agreed to adopt this new comment from
>the WG so I'm proposing to replace the version that currently exists in the
>DCMES changes document with the version above.
>
>Pete, does this version satisfy your concern about the wording?
>
>cheers
>Andrew
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: A mailing list for the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative's Usage
>Board [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Thomas Baker
>Sent: 30 March 2006 14:16
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Seattle agenda to discuss in telecon
>
>
>All,
>
>Here is a draft agenda for discussion on today's telecon.
>I hope you all (or enough of you) will have Internet access
>during the call. The following http:// links are already
>working (I am working on the other ones...):
>
>-- The agenda:
> http://stage.dublincore.org/admin/www/usage/meetings/2006/04/seattle/
>
>-- Attn Andrew:
> http://stage.dublincore.org/usage/meetings/2006/04/seattle/dcmes-changes/
>
>-- Attn Diane:
> http://stage.dublincore.org/usage/meetings/2006/04/seattle/term-changes/
> http://stage.dublincore.org/usage/meetings/2006/04/seattle/nsdl-registry/
> stage.dublincore.org/usage/meetings/2006/04/seattle/wikipedia/
>
>-- Attn Andy:
> http://stage.dublincore.org/usage/meetings/2006/04/seattle/all-in-dcterms
>/
> http://stage.dublincore.org/usage/meetings/2006/04/seattle/domains-ranges
>/
>
>-- Attn Stuart:
> http://stage.dublincore.org/usage/meetings/2006/04/seattle/dcmitype/
> stage.dublincore.org/usage/meetings/2006/04/seattle/ub-process/
>
>-- Attn Tom
> stage.dublincore.org/usage/meetings/2006/04/seattle/profile-pipeli
>ne/
> stage.dublincore.org/usage/meetings/2006/04/seattle/profile-review
>/
> stage.dublincore.org/usage/meetings/2006/04/seattle/rda-review/
> stage.dublincore.org/usage/meetings/2006/04/seattle/semantic-speci
>ficity/
> stage.dublincore.org/usage/meetings/2006/04/seattle/docn-roadmap/
> stage.dublincore.org/usage/meetings/2006/04/seattle/backburner/
>
>Corrections and additions welcome. Shepherds should please
>confirm to me that my summary is accurate and suggest documents
>to include (or exclude) from the meeting packet.
>
>In the call today, I would like to determine whether the
>topics are well-clustered and whether the times allotted
>are realistic.
>
>Tom
>
>------
>
>Title: Usage Board meeting - agenda
>Identifier:
>http://stage.dublincore.org/admin/www/usage/meetings/2006/04/seattle/
>Created: 2006-03-30
>
>Seattle, 29-30 April 2006
>Venue: http://stage.dublincore.org/usage/meetings/2006/04/seattle/venue/
>
>Saturday, 29 April 2006 - 9:00 to 12:00
>
>-- Changes to terms in the DCMES namespace (Andrew)
> http://stage.dublincore.org/usage/meetings/2006/04/seattle/dcmes-changes/
>
>-- Changes to terms in the DCTERMS namespace (Diane)
> http://stage.dublincore.org/usage/meetings/2006/04/seattle/term-changes/
>
>-- Replicating DCMES terms in the DCTERMS namespace (Andy)
> http://stage.dublincore.org/usage/meetings/2006/04/seattle/all-in-dcterms
>/
>
>Saturday, 29 April 2006 - 13:00 to 17:00
>
>-- DCMI property domains and ranges (Andy) - before dcmitype
> http://stage.dublincore.org/usage/meetings/2006/04/seattle/domains-ranges
>/
>
>-- Finalizing DCMI Type Vocabulary (Stuart) - after domains-ranges
> http://stage.dublincore.org/usage/meetings/2006/04/seattle/dcmitype/
>
>Sunday, 30 April 2006 - 9:00 to 12:00
>
>-- NSDL Registry (Diane) - before profile-review
> http://stage.dublincore.org/usage/meetings/2006/04/seattle/nsdl-registry/
>
>-- Review of Application Profiles: Reference documents (Tom) - after
>nsdl-registry
> http
>://stage.dublincore.org/usage/meetings/2006/04/seattle/profile-review/
>
>-- Review of Application Profiles: the pipeline (Tom)
> http
>://stage.dublincore.org/usage/meetings/2006/04/seattle/profile-pipeline/
>
>Sunday, 30 April 2006 - 13:00 to 17:00
>
>-- Article about Dublin Core in Wikipedia (Diane)
> http ://stage.dublincore.org/usage/meetings/2006/04/seattle/wikipedia/
>
>-- Review of Resource Description and Access (RDA, aka AACR3) (Tom, Diane)
> http ://stage.dublincore.org/usage/meetings/2006/04/seattle/rda-review/
>
>-- The "semantic specificity" issue (Tom)
> http
>://stage.dublincore.org/usage/meetings/2006/04/seattle/semantic-specificity/
>
>-- DCMI Documentation Roadmap (Tom)
> http ://stage.dublincore.org/usage/meetings/2006/04/seattle/docn-roadmap/
>
>-- DCMI Usage Board process (Diane, Stuart)
> http ://stage.dublincore.org/usage/meetings/2006/04/seattle/ub-process/
>
>-- Backburner issues
> http ://stage.dublincore.org/usage/meetings/2006/04/seattle/backburner/
> http://stage.dublincore.org/usageboard/2006/2006-02.backburner/
>
>--
>Dr. Thomas Baker [log in to unmask]
>Director, Specifications and Documentation
>Dublin Core Metadata Initiative
|