Looks fine to me. Wait until the rebuild - its only 10 days away.
Andrew
-----Original Message-----
From: A mailing list for the Dublin Core Metadata Initiative's Usage
Board [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Thomas Baker
Sent: 02 March 2006 08:49
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Response to dc-general about Type Vocabulary changes
> 3. DCMI Type Vocabulary comment period (Stuart)
>
> Please read, for discussion:
>
http://stage.dublincore.org/usageboard/2006/2006-01.dcmitype/2006-02-20.Type
_Vocabulary_Public_Discussion.html
>
> ACTION 2006-02-23 Stuart: Revise table (above), removing "UB" column.
> ACTION 2006-02-23 Tom: Get revised table from Stuart, post for
publication on March 13.
> ACTION 2006-02-23 Stuart: Provide paragraph for dc-general posting.
For a dc-general message, I suggest something like:
The public comment period for changes to the DCMI Type
Vocabulary [1] which ended on 31 January yielded some
important suggestions for improvements. The Usage Board
will consider these suggestions at its next meeting,
29-30 April in Seattle. Many thanks to Ann Apps, Vladimir
Makarov, Gregory Renaud, and Misha Wolf for their useful
comments [2].
[1]
http://dublincore.org/usage/public-comment/2005/12/type-vocabulary-changes/
[2]
http://dublincore.org/usageboard/2006/2006-01.dcmitype/2006-02-20.Type_Vocab
ulary_Public_Discussion.html
Is this enough for now, or should we expand on this? Do we
want to get the message out right now (e.g., tomorrow), or
should we wait for the March 13 build, when [2] will be made
available in its revised form?
Tom
--
Dr. Thomas Baker [log in to unmask]
Director, Specifications and Documentation
Dublin Core Metadata Initiative
|