medieval-religion: Scholarly discussions of medieval religion and culture
You might try to increase the text by pressing the "150 %"-button in the
upper resp. lower left corner of the jpg-Box and / or decreasing your screen
resolution.
Unfortunately OCR-ing the jpgs is not an option as they are pretty low
resolution (75 dpi).
Good luck
Karl-Georg Schon
-----Original Message-----
From: medieval-religion - Scholarly discussions of medieval religious
culture [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Christopher
Crockett
Sent: Sonntag, 22. Januar 2006 18:47
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [M-R] DuCange Glossarium (was Re: [M-R] Martyr)
medieval-religion: Scholarly discussions of medieval religion and culture
From: Karl-Georg Schon <[log in to unmask]>
> Talking about resources on the web:
>
> Nearly the whole body of the Monumenta Germaniae Historica (except
> volumes
printed less than five years ago) is available under http://www.dmgh.de. So
far there are only fairly good jpgs of the volumes, but it is apparently
planned to have a searchable database at a later stage as well.
thank you, Karl-Georg.
alas, the .jpgs(!) are, indeed, "fairly good" --the text is a bit small for
my old eyes.
as for searchability, i spoke too soon about the Stanford Chevalier .pdf
files.
they are "searchable" because they have been run through an OCR program, but
when i examine a section of the text as an ascii file, i find that there are
an enormous number of errors, as one would expect from a first draft
straight from an OCR session --most of the text is there, but not all of it.
this is, partly, a function of the complex typography and the poor state of
the fonts used.
some folks talk about putting whole libraries on-line, but it seems to me
that those folks have never had any experience trying to OCR an older
(pre-20th c.) book.
working in the MGH's favor is the fact that those tomes are exceptionally
well printed, with clear typography --unlike, say, the volumes of the PL,
which are nearly hopeless to OCR.
the digitalised PL was done, i am told, by sending the volumes to Calcutta,
where they were keystroked in by human druges, where two seperate copies
were made of each page; the ascii texts of these two were then compared by a
computer program, and the variants between the two resolved by a human being
who looked back at the text, making the correction.
i have yet to find an error in that on-line PL but, statistically, it stands
to reason that two typists would have made the same mistake at least a few
times, in all those 200+ volumes.
c
**********************************************************************
To join the list, send the message: join medieval-religion YOUR NAME
to: [log in to unmask]
To send a message to the list, address it to:
[log in to unmask] To leave the list, send the message: leave
medieval-religion
to: [log in to unmask]
In order to report problems or to contact the list's owners, write to:
[log in to unmask]
For further information, visit our web site:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/medieval-religion.html
**********************************************************************
To join the list, send the message: join medieval-religion YOUR NAME
to: [log in to unmask]
To send a message to the list, address it to:
[log in to unmask]
To leave the list, send the message: leave medieval-religion
to: [log in to unmask]
In order to report problems or to contact the list's owners, write to:
[log in to unmask]
For further information, visit our web site:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/medieval-religion.html
|