JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for PLAGIARISM Archives


PLAGIARISM Archives

PLAGIARISM Archives


PLAGIARISM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PLAGIARISM Home

PLAGIARISM Home

PLAGIARISM  2006

PLAGIARISM 2006

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Coaching - strong opinion warning.

From:

Diane Brewster <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Plagiarism <[log in to unmask]>, Diane Brewster <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 3 Mar 2006 15:53:42 +0000

Content-Type:

multipart/alternative

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (159 lines) , text/enriched (246 lines)

I recently ran a small "experiment" on referencing with 14 first year 
linguistics students, only three of them said they had been given any 
explicit teaching on how to reference prior to coming to Sussex.  
Interestingly for us there was a US exchange student among the group 
who said she'd heard less on plagiarism in her 2 yrs at her home 
university than she had in 2 months here - but I have to confess that 
our Linguistics department is particularly hot on methodology issues.

I have three teenagers in various stages of high school - so the small 
number who had been taught about referencing didn't surprise me in the 
slightest.  "put it in your own words" and "don't copy" are mantras 
teachers in all subjects use without really thinking about what they 
are really saying i.e. "paraphrasing is OK" and "you shouldn't have too 
many quotes" are the messages being received by the students.  When I 
try to tackle the issues with my own daughters I get the standard "oh 
mum shut up - that's not what Mr X wants us to do".

As for the age at which to start,.. hmmm, I would say teaching students 
that knowledge comes from sources, not thin air or their own heads, is 
probably a good thing from a very early age - particularly if you can 
build in the idea that people have arguments all of the time about some 
of the knowledge (although a project on France might not be the best 
starting point for that one!) interesting that the teacher wanted a 
"Bibliography" for a project where the instructions were only to use 
the Internet!  I hope s/he explained how to reference URLs properly :-)

Diane

On 3 Mar 2006, at 15:15, Raeburn, Scott wrote:

> Diane
>  
> Your comments about high school are interesting - the approach in 
> schools to coursework is a problem. However, there may be help on the 
> way, at least for some of us.
>  
> 1) In the last couple of months I've seen guidelines for Scottish high 
> schools from the SQA (sort of exam board) which discuss plagiarism, 
> etc. in coursework for 4th+  year pupils (including advice to 
> parents!).
>  
> 2) This week my granddaughter (age 9 ) in Primary 5 in Falkirk was 
> given a 'project' on France. The instructions included "use a computer 
> and the Internet, don't copy, use your own words and include a 
> bibliography". The teacher will, of course, explain all these ideas. 
>  
> The 1st seems sensible but is 2) a bit of overkill? When is a good age 
> to start all this? Is there anything like this going on in other parts 
> of the country?
>  
> I suppose it might mean that we'll be alright in about 10 years time!
>  
> Scott
>  
>
> Scott Raeburn
> Academic Conduct Officer
> School of Computing
> Napier University
> Merchiston Campus
> Edinburgh EH10 5DT
>
> Tel: +44 (0)131 455 2716
> Fax: +44 (0)131 455 2727
> Email: [log in to unmask]
>  
>  
>
> From: Plagiarism [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Diane 
> Brewster
> Sent: 03 March 2006 14:34
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Coaching - strong opinion warning.
>
>
>
> On 3 Mar 2006, at 09:36, Mike Reddy wrote:
> <snip>
>>
>> Students are only potential cheats, looking for the loop hole, if you 
>> choose to see them that way.
>>
>> The attitude to plagiarism, copying and making of learning into an 
>> issue of offence is one that I am hoping will be the subject of a 
>> workshop at the next Plagiarism Conference. It needs an open and 
>> frank, possibly bloody debate. I could be completely wrong. I'd love 
>> to know what others think and whether they see this as an 
>> interesting/important part of the problem to discuss.
>> >>
> count me in on that workshop. I think this is absolutely central, the 
> more I read about the issue the more my blood boils at times, and the 
> more I begin to think Peter Levin has it right about the witch hunt 
> being waged against students in some quarters.
>
> Students find the rules about referencing complicated and confusing, 
> in the past they only had to worry about these once they reached 
> postgraduate level as there was no such thing as coursework - we all 
> sat a bunch of 3 hr exams at the end of 3 yrs, swapping each others 
> essays for revision purposes was positively encouraged. Now, 
> practically every bit of work they produce is formally assessed, not 
> only do they have to handle getting to grips with their subject but 
> also the rules of the referencing game - and very few of them have 
> been adequately taught to do this in high school.
>
> I think the driving analogy is a good one too, and one I have used 
> with overseas students in particular - i.e. when you come into a new 
> country you can't expect that the rules of the road will be the same 
> as in your home country- the academic "rules of the road" in the UK 
> with respect to plagiarism and referencing might be different from the 
> ones you are used to. Do we extend the analogy and have the tutor as 
> driving instructor? if so then we have a responsibility to ensure that 
> the students *know* there is a highway code which will be examined as 
> well as their ability to drive the car.... a lot of academics seem to 
> be seeing themselves in the role of traffic police...
>
> Diane
>
> Diane Brewster
>
> Research Fellow
> IDEAS Lab
> Dept Informatics
> University of Sussex
> Falmer
> Brighton BN19QH
>
> http://ideas.fcs.sussex.ac.uk/~D.M.Brewster/
>
> [log in to unmask]
> 01273 678767
> This message is intended for the addressee(s) only and should not be 
> read, copied or disclosed to anyone else outwith the University 
> without the permission of the sender. It is your responsibility to 
> ensure that this message and any attachments are scanned for viruses 
> or other defects. Napier University does not accept liability for any 
> loss or damage which may result from this email or any attachment, or 
> for errors or omissions arising after it was sent. Email is not a 
> secure medium. Email entering the University's system is subject to 
> routine monitoring and filtering by the University.
Diane Brewster
Research Fellow
IDEAS Lab
Dept Informatics
University of Sussex
Falmer
Brighton BN19QH

http://ideas.fcs.sussex.ac.uk/~D.M.Brewster/
[log in to unmask]
01273 678767


*************************************************************************
You are subscribed to the JISC Plagiarism mailing list. To Unsubscribe, change
your subscription options, or access list archives,  visit
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/PLAGIARISM.html
*************************************************************************

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
November 2023
October 2023
July 2023
May 2023
April 2023
January 2023
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
August 2021
May 2021
April 2021
January 2021
October 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
March 2020
February 2020
December 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
May 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager