Dear Chuck,
My email addresses are working fine for everyone else: maybe there's
a secret filter that has emerged against the sorts of things you say?
I don't know, but it would be an interesting example, perhaps.
What is strange about your response is that you are interested in my
PS, but don't answer my request for clarification so I still can't
respond to your questioning. I asked you to explain what you intend by
>>> Where in your concept of intelligence as interactive sharing do you
>>> locate
>>> interpretaion and the formulation of expression?
because I don't understand it.
Would you do that?
Thanks
Ranulph
On 16 Jan 2006, at 16:11, Charles Burnette wrote:
> On 1/16/06 9:36 AM, "Ranulph Glanville" <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
>> By the way, I say we find intelligence in interactive sharing. I was
>> interested in where we locate the evidence. I don't quite say (or at
>> least I don't quite mean to say) that it is interactive sharing.
>>
> But Ranulph "locating evidence" is neither interpretation or
> expression
> applied to the located evidence. That points to the problem I'm
> having with
> your statement.
>
> Chuck
>
> PS (I'm posting this only because my prior e-mail was rejected by your
> direct e-mail adress and I want to be sure you receive this one.)
>>
>> On 16 Jan 2006, at 14:22, Charles Burnette wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 1/16/06 7:31 AM, "Ranulph Glanville" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Intelligence is somehow a quality that we find
>>>> within systems, that is, we find intelligence through sharing:
>>>> not by
>>>> observing, describing/explaining and then applying.
>>>
>>> Where in your concept of intelligence as interactive sharing do you
>>> locate
>>> interpretaion and the formulation of expression?
>>>
>>> With interest in your response,
>>> Chuck
>>
|