On 21 Apr 2006, at 10:30, Michael Chanan wrote:
> Secondly, the idea that the boom in the shot
> could be the result of incorrect masking during the projection is
> ridiculous
> - either it's in frame or it isn't.
Well, I've worked as a projectionist and it's often the case that in a
film shot in 1.66 ratio but intended for projection in 1.85 the boom is
frequently visible if one projects the print with a 1.66 masking plate
in place,
Nicky Hamlyn.
*
*
Film-Philosophy Email Discussion Salon.
After hitting 'reply' please always delete the text of the message you are replying to.
To leave, send the message: leave film-philosophy to: [log in to unmask]
For help email: [log in to unmask], not the salon.
**
|