JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for FILM-PHILOSOPHY Archives


FILM-PHILOSOPHY Archives

FILM-PHILOSOPHY Archives


FILM-PHILOSOPHY@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

FILM-PHILOSOPHY Home

FILM-PHILOSOPHY Home

FILM-PHILOSOPHY  2006

FILM-PHILOSOPHY 2006

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Call for Papers

From:

Francesca Liguoro <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Film-Philosophy Salon <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 6 Mar 2006 04:06:25 -0700

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (138 lines)

Cinemascope - Independent Film Journal
www.cinemascope.it 

Issue 6
September - December 2006 

Call for Papers 

Powerful Reflections
Moving Analysis and Exercise of Power 


edited by
Francesca Liguoro 


Please, send your proposal to
[log in to unmask] 

 

Power, in its relations and effects, is so often taken either directly or
indirectly as the central dynamic for understanding. Cinema, it seems,
offers an opportunity to get beyond and/or qualify this perspective, helpful
and even fruitful as it is and has been, but also limiting and perhaps not
well suited to appreciating film in its specificity nor reality in its
diversity. The theme is much more precise than exploration of other
perspectives. Cinemascope invites thoughtful reflections --- from
professional scholars and others who have the courage to affront this
challenge ---  on  ways of understanding that will turn this power-based
analysis inside out. Film and its analysis opens up many spaces in the field
or webs of power so that other realities, perspectives and understandings
can emerge. Cinemascope is excited about devoting an issue of their online
journal to ways that late 20th cc analysis and its achievements can provide
a basis for advances in film studies today, and indeed for the particular
contributions of film and its theory to human understanding for these times. 

The following observation may help to clarify the theme and orient
reflection, beginning with a sketch of the place of power in recent action
and analysis, but also a particular challenge to that analytic key issuing
from what is arguably the closest elaborated analysis of power 

The logics of power constitute superior keys of reading in the
interpretation in full range of interrelations in dynamics. 

Obviously, power is displayed in many forms. There are forms based on force,
on oppression, on physical violence or psychological imposition. There are
forms grounded in charisma, on self-affirmation and authority, on the
experience of an individual or group. There are forms of power based on
admiration, reverence, and on the faith and trust placed in someone. By
means of such forms, power affects and even regulates all relations in which
human beings live: familial, social, interpersonal, professional, political,
economic. In this way, power is directly implicated in the cultural, social
and political structures. As a result, to know where power is, and how to
regulate it is necessary for social and biological survival, but also any
kind of optimization. This is explored theoretically. For instance, a
bio-anthropological  interpretation of human action serves to focus
attention once again on the concept of power as a determinant in various
current manifestations. In this way, then, the principle of the survival and
indeed domination of the fittest and strongest in nature is linked to modern
cultural   norms (among others), lending primordial and biological basis to
human behaviours. 

Before this insistence on the centrality of power in action and thought, the
Marxist theorist John Holloway (in his book Change the World Without Taking
Power) has delivered a challenge: conceptualize the above-mentioned
relations and structures without the support of a foundational investigative
and interpretative category like that of power; abandon the concept of power
as a point of reference in the interpretation of the real and in the
struture of thought itself. 

Cinemascope invites analyses of this drama of power and its displacement as
found in cinema and its theory. In light of the difficulaty of appreciating
the full impact of Hollowayıs challenge,  but also the necessity to ground
and locate that confrontation within the operations of power which remain
very real and energetic, Cinemascope proposes three approaches and programs: 

1. Unmask and bring to light dynamics of power --- either of an oppressive
or charismatic nature ---
present in films which do not have power (personal, political, sexual,
social, economic, etc.) as explicit themes and in which this
political-ideological background is not evident, but rather where the
dynamics of power are unexpectedly and unforseeably hidden. 


2. Analyze the stylistic modalities of films with an explicit political
ideological theme where by the use of such modality, there is the attempt by
means of film language to deconstruct, without or with success, the dynamics
of power. 

3. Identify and clarify ways that recent films (or a film) either confirm or
disprove suggestion such as Hollowayıs that power and its dynamics are
giving way to and clearing a way for other basis of analysis and action 

Being well-aware that power excercises its influence even more by the logic
of forms than the logic of contents, Cinemscope welcomes studies that
consider the operation of power by means of the cinematographic language
(use of sound, editing and framing, the use of light, etc.). 

In addition to these, Cinemascope welcomes parallel studies which analyze
cinematic style from philoosophical, social, historical and political points
of view focusing attention on cinematographic representation.... 

At the same time, on this occasion Cinemascope cannot accept proposals
concerning the cinema industry or the culture industry in general in so far
as they are not inherently part of the focus on representation. 

The objective of Cinemascope is to discover the extent to which cinematic
representation is part of the construction of the category of power as a
dominant key in interpretation of reality, and how much, to the contrary,
that it is able to be part of the process of  deconstruction of that
category. 


DEADLINES 

Proposals: April 30, 2006 

Notice  of Acceptance of Proposals by Cinemascope: May 14, 2006 

Reception of Articles: July 16, 2006 

Length of Articles: max 5000 words 


Issue Editor: Francesca Liguoro
Editorial Board: Giustina DıOriano, Frank Coffey 

Language: English 

*
*
Film-Philosophy Email Discussion Salon.
After hitting 'reply' please always delete the text of the message you are replying to.
To leave, send the message: leave film-philosophy to: [log in to unmask]
For help email: [log in to unmask], not the salon.
**

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager