damian writes:
>that is not the same thing as saying that 'jump cuts' were originally
>*intended* as disruptions to a practice of continuity, and certainly
>not an open disavowal of the continuity system
demonstrating yet again that s the thread gets more serpentine we
can easily lose sight of where the head is and where the tail is
my point, for better or worse, was to distinguish the jump cut
from intellectual montage, and to point out that the former is
--as i said -- merely a syntactical solecism, while the latter was
at least in part intended as a disruption of continuity if not
a disavowal of it
the head of this particular serpent was the issue of intellectual montage
,
and it is that that i was trying to address
mike
==
*
*
Film-Philosophy Email Discussion Salon.
After hitting 'reply' please always delete the text of the message you are replying to.
To leave, send the message: leave film-philosophy to: [log in to unmask]
For help email: [log in to unmask], not the salon.
**
|