Thankyou for the thoughtful replies to my query re: the congruence between
the Kierkegaardian "monad" and the individual frame of film is striking, as
is the dependence of film on memory even for it's basic illusion of motion
to say nothing of the role of memory in the extraction of story from
narrative (that is, the experience of one thing after another) just as
Kierkegaard's individual is to an important degree willed into being. This
is the direction I am going with a paper on the remake...But I must admit I
still sometimes find these two difficult ...
J. G
Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
*
*
Film-Philosophy Email Discussion Salon.
After hitting 'reply' please always delete the text of the message you are replying to.
To leave, send the message: leave film-philosophy to: [log in to unmask]
For help email: [log in to unmask], not the salon.
**
|