the devil wears nothing–or anything, given the occasion–I suppose.
the film is banal, I believe.
there are strongly comical scenes where the main character sulks in
expensive dressings on a new yorkene sidewalks, with expensive
collars and a little hat, but that doesn't have the same feel of
porno movie(camera placing and bad yellowish color-tweaking) of Sex &
the City–since someone mentioned it.
it is a tale about knowing what is really beneficial and what is not,
ignoring it altogether while managing to look very good–very
relatively so , one couldargue y–and still apparently succeeding very
well in LIFE, apart from all the timing, placing and time(really)
forever lost. By the tone it has, it is supposed to educate very slow-
thinking, unimaginative children about how to take twice as long to
reach a goal.
it is parodical precisely on where it is trying to communicate
seriously; and that is disastrous when people no longer see a parody–
given the quantity of TV time–and take completely confused and
superficial reasoning as an emotional-lesson.
or maybe it is just a film about bullshit and I am exaggerating. :-)
*
*
Film-Philosophy Email Discussion Salon.
After hitting 'reply' please always delete the text of the message you are replying to.
To leave, send the message: leave film-philosophy to: [log in to unmask]
For help email: [log in to unmask], not the salon.
**
|