JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH Archives


EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH Archives

EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH Archives


EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH Home

EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH Home

EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH  November 2005

EVIDENCE-BASED-HEALTH November 2005

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

FDA requested additional information for the neuropsychiatric adverse events from Japanese MHLW

From:

Takeo SAIO <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Takeo SAIO <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 18 Nov 2005 10:09:51 +0900

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (235 lines)

Copied as 'fair use'.

http://www.fda.gov/cder/drug/infopage/tamiflu/QA20051117.htm

Tamiflu Pediatric Adverse Events: Questions and Answers
General Meeting Questions:
Why are certain drugs having their safety reports presented to the Pediatric 
Advisory Committee on November 18, 2005?

The eight products being reviewed are presently due for a public discussion 
of their adverse events as required by Section 17 of the Best 
Pharmaceuticals for Children Act (BPCA). BPCA mandates the review of the 
adverse event reports received during the one-year after a drug has been 
granted pediatric exclusivity. The FDA's Office of Pediatric Therapeutics 
(OPT) is authorized to carry out this mandate and is directed by law to 
refer such adverse event reports to the Pediatric Advisory Committee (PAC) 
for their review and recommendations regarding any regulatory actions.


What are the drugs being presented on November 18, 2005?

The following drugs, which received their marketing exclusivity at least one 
year prior to this meeting, will be discussed:

Anagrelide (Agrylin)
Carboplatin (Paraplatin)
Fluconazole (Diflucan)
Irinotecan (Camptosar)
Oseltamivir (Tamiflu).
Rofecoxib (Vioxx)
Sodium ferric gluconate complex (Ferrlecit)
Sumatriptan (Imitrex)


Why is there an in-depth presentation on Tamiflu (oseltamivir)? What will 
the presentation include?

The PAC will hear several presentations on oseltamivir (Tamiflu) including 
adverse event reports, a literature review, and analysis of the clinical 
trials data. In addition, the sponsor will present data from the clinical 
trials and safety assessments. A CDC presentation will also provide 
background information on the United States Surveillance Data on Influenza 
and their new pediatric influenza surveillance efforts. The review of the 
adverse event reports for Tamiflu will discuss pediatric deaths, serious 
skin reactions, and neuropsychiatric events. These events were reported 
almost entirely in children from Japan.

Specific Questions on Tamiflu:
What is Tamiflu and what is it approved for?

Tamiflu (oseltamivir phosphate) is an antiviral drug approved for treatment 
of uncomplicated influenza A and B in patients 1 year of age or older. It is 
also approved for prophylaxis (prevention) of influenza in people 13 years 
or older after household contact or at high risk for exposure during 
influenza season. Tamiflu is one of a group of anti-influenza drugs called 
neuraminidase inhibitors that act by blocking the viral enzyme neuraminidase 
which helps the influenza virus invade cells in the respiratory tract.


Does this discussion have anything to do with the pandemic preparations?

The Pediatric Advisory Committee discussion is not directly addressing any 
issues related to pandemic flu preparations. Indirectly, a better 
understanding of Tamiflu safety in children will be useful should a pandemic 
occur and there is widespread use of Tamiflu.


Is Tamiflu approved for use in pediatric patients?

Tamiflu is available in both capsule and liquid formulations. It is approved 
for treatment of influenza in children over 1 year of age. In the U.S., 
Tamiflu is dosed according to body weight in younger children. Older 
children (over 40 kg or 88 lbs) and adolescents receive the same dose as 
adults. It is also approved for prophylaxis (prevention) of influenza in 
children over 13 years of age.


What is useful about Tamiflu in pediatric patients? Who should use it?

When used as directed (twice daily for 5 days) Tamiflu can reduce the 
duration of influenza symptoms in otherwise healthy children by 1 to 1 ? 
days. It also appears to reduce the severity of common flu symptoms. 
Consequently, it may allow children to return to school or other normal 
activities sooner. Tamiflu was also shown to be similarly effective in 
children who had a history of asthma and did not worsen the asthma symptoms.

Tamiflu is most effective when taken within 48 hours after the beginning of 
flu symptoms and not likely to be effective if patients have already had flu 
symptoms for several days. Patients (and their parents) should be aware that 
some patients with influenza may be at risk for secondary bacterial 
infections and should seek medical care if they are not improving within a 
few days of beginning Tamiflu.

Tamiflu has not been studied in children with very severe or complicated 
influenza who require hospitalization and it is not known whether it will 
provide the same benefit to children with severe illness.


What are the important safety issues and adverse events?

When Tamiflu was studied in clinical trials as treatment for children with 
influenza, children taking Tamiflu experienced similar side effects as 
children not taking Tamiflu. Serious side effects were not identified. The 
most common side effects observed in both the treatment and prophylaxis 
trials were nausea and vomiting. In these trials, a small number of children 
stopped taking their Tamiflu because of nausea and vomiting or other adverse 
reactions.

In the safety review mandated by the BPCA, a number of adverse event reports 
were identified associated with the use of Tamiflu in children 16 years of 
age or younger. These adverse event reports were primarily related to 
unusual neurologic or psychiatric events such as delirium, hallucinations, 
confusion, abnormal behavior, convulsions, and encephalitis. These events 
were reported almost entirely in children from Japan who received Tamiflu 
according to Japanese treatment guidelines (very similar but not identical 
to U.S. treatment guidelines). The review identified a total of 12 deaths in 
pediatric patients since Tamiflu's approval. All of the pediatric deaths 
were reported in Japanese children. In many of these cases, a relationship 
to Tamiflu was difficult to assess because of the use of other medications, 
presence of other medical conditions, and/or lack of adequate detail in the 
reports.

The review also identified severe skin reactions (like allergic reactions) 
in some pediatric patients. These events were not all reported in Japanese 
children and have also been reported in adults. Severe skin reactions in all 
age groups are currently being reviewed in more detail.


Why are many of the adverse events being reported from Japan?

Initially, it was not clear why the neuropsychiatric adverse events and 
deaths were reported almost entirely in Japanese children. The FDA receives 
adverse event reports from all over the world and usually adverse events are 
roughly the same from different reporting countries. The reports of death 
and neuropsychiatric events associated with Tamiflu, almost entirely from 
Japan, was unusual enough to prompt further evaluation.

The FDA requested additional information from both Hoffman-La Roche, the 
pharmaceutical company which produces Tamiflu, and the Japanese Ministry of 
Health, Labor, and Welfare. FDA then evaluated several possible explanations 
for the neuropsychiatric adverse events.

Was it possible that Japanese patients metabolize Tamiflu differently than 
American or European patients or have higher levels of the drug in their 
bodies? There is no scientific evidence that this is true and Japanese 
dosing recommendations are very similar to U.S. and European 
recommendations.

Was it possible that these events were an unusual manifestation of influenza 
infection? There is good evidence that neuropsychiatric events can occur 
with influenza, in the absence of Tamiflu or other treatment. Beginning in 
the mid-1990s, there have been many reports in the pediatric scientific 
literature describing a syndrome of influenza-associated encephalitis 
(inflammation of the brain) or encephalopathy. These reports originated 
primarily from Japan where pediatricians described a pattern of rapid onset 
of fever, accompanied by convulsions and altered level of consciousness, 
progressing to coma within a few days of the onset of flu symptoms. This 
syndrome frequently resulted in death or significant neurologic sequelae. 
These reports prompted nationwide surveillance of influenza-associated 
encephalopathy in Japan. This syndrome was described and the surveillance in 
Japan was in progress before Tamiflu was approved for the treatment of 
influenza.

Was it possible that the large number of adverse events from Japan was 
because the Japanese use more Tamiflu? Is it possible that we may see more 
U.S. cases as use of Tamiflu increases in this country? Partly because of 
the awareness in Japan of influenza-associated encephalopathy, the Japanese 
health service will pay for rapid diagnostic testing for influenza in 
children and subsequent treatment. Japan currently uses the majority of the 
world's supply of Tamiflu distributed for seasonal influenza. It is possible 
that some of these events might be observed in the U.S. population if the 
use of Tamiflu increases substantially.

Finally, was it possible that the neuropsychiatric events reported from 
Japan reflect different methods and requirements for adverse event 
reporting? Both the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare and Roche 
confirmed that Japanese regulators require an intensive period of active 
adverse event reporting for 6 months after a product is approved. When 
Tamiflu was approved for prophylaxis of influenza in Japan, Roche and its 
Japanese pharmaceutical affiliate actively solicited adverse event reports 
from 70,000 institutions and physicians in Japan. These adverse event 
reports included the 2003-04 flu season and were subsequently reported to 
the FDA and are included in the BPCA safety review.

It is particularly difficult to assess the relationship of Tamiflu to the 
reported pediatric deaths. It is known that young children (less than 2 
years of age) are hospitalized more often for influenza-associated illness 
than older children and young adults. Infants and the elderly are known to 
have higher influenza-associated death rates than other age groups. However, 
in the U.S., influenza deaths in children were not among the events 
requiring reporting to public health departments and the CDC until the 
2004-05 flu season.

Review of the available information on the safety of Tamiflu in pediatric 
patients suggests that the increased reports of neuropsychiatric events in 
Japanese children are most likely related to an increased awareness of 
influenza-associated encephalopathy, increased access to Tamiflu in that 
population, and a coincident period of intensive monitoring adverse events. 
Based on the information available to us, we can not conclude that there is 
a causal relationship between Tamiflu and the reported pediatric deaths.


What are FDAs next steps?

The evaluation of the pediatric adverse events will be discussed in more 
detail at the Pediatric Advisory Committee on November 18, 2005; FDA looks 
forward to comments from the Advisory Committee members. FDA anticipates it 
will continue to monitor the adverse event profile, including 
neuropsychiatric adverse events, in all ages including pediatric patients, 
and will report back to the Pediatric Advisory Committee within 2 years. 
Through these activities we expect to further refine our understanding of 
the adverse event profile of Tamiflu. As we did last flu season, we will 
continue to collaborate with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 
to share information regarding influenza surveillance in the U.S. population 
and the use of antivirals, including Tamiflu, for treatment.


What should I do about this information?

If you or your child is receiving Tamflu for the treatment of influenza and 
you are concerned that you may be experiencing a drug-related adverse event, 
you should contact your physician for advice and management. Adverse events 
should be reported to the FDA through the on-line MedWatch system or by 
phone.

Keep in mind that the most effective way to prevent influenza and its 
complications is by getting the annual influenza vaccine. Children younger 
than or equal to 8 years of age receiving their first influenza vaccine 
should receive the vaccine split into 2 doses given one month apart. 
Children from 6 months to 2 years of age and those with certain underlying 
medical conditions are considered at high risk for developing complications 
of influenza and are strongly encouraged to get the vaccine.

Date created: November 17, 2005 

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager