medieval-religion: Scholarly discussions of medieval religion and culture
I am always suspicious of scholarly opinion. I really don't believe there is an
ounce of evidence one way or the other. But this is the 21st century and who
cares? Don't we now deal with the text rather that its prehistory? Or is the
meganarrative still alive and well in some theological circles?
V. Kerry Inman
John Briggs wrote:
> >> Scholarly opinion now holds that this Jude is not the author of the
> >> epistle of Jude.
> >
> The basis of Phyllis's statement is that the Jude, real or pseudonymous, who
> was author of the Epistle, was not the Apostle.
>
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> To join the list, send the message: join medieval-religion YOUR NAME
> to: [log in to unmask]
> To send a message to the list, address it to:
> [log in to unmask]
> To leave the list, send the message: leave medieval-religion
> to: [log in to unmask]
> In order to report problems or to contact the list's owners, write to:
> [log in to unmask]
> For further information, visit our web site:
> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/medieval-religion.html
>
**********************************************************************
To join the list, send the message: join medieval-religion YOUR NAME
to: [log in to unmask]
To send a message to the list, address it to:
[log in to unmask]
To leave the list, send the message: leave medieval-religion
to: [log in to unmask]
In order to report problems or to contact the list's owners, write to:
[log in to unmask]
For further information, visit our web site:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/medieval-religion.html
|