On Tuesday 28 June 2005 11:16, Steve Traylen wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 03:18:55PM +0100 or thereabouts, Alex Martin wrote:
> > On Monday 27 June 2005 09:54, Gordon, JC (John) wrote:
> > > The main requirement that is left unsatisfied is that of folk who wish
> > > to eyeball all code they run on their systems. I don't think this
> > > should be left to individual sysadmins. All of our middleware should be
> > > subject to external security review, gLite: for example. I have no
> > > solution to this.
> >
> > Hi John,
> > just to clarify, the reason, I requested the source code
> > was so that I could look into hacking together a simple SRM to POSIX
> > filesystem solution, in principle this must be a subset of the
> > supported solutions and though it was something I could sortout given the
> > existing codebase. Obviously, I would much prefer that someone else
> > wrote and supported this.
>
> From Jens
>
> <quote>
> The SRM has an open source licence and IIRC so does DCAP
> but dCache itself does not and is not likely to get it.
> </quote>
>
> In fact the SRM can be downloaded now and it already includes
> a POSIX type layer though it is not heavily tested.
>
> I did once find the URL of this, but I cannot find it now.
>
>
> --jens
>
Yes, I already found this: http://www-isd.fnal.gov/srm/unix-fs-srm/
My original mails were partly to ascertain how this related to the
dcache release....if its actually the same codebase its good news I guess.
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |
| Dr. Alex Martin |
| e-Mail: [log in to unmask] Queen Mary, University of London, |
| Phone : +44-(0)20-7882-5033 Mile End Road, |
| Fax : +44-(0)20-8981-9465 London, UK E1 4NS |
| |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|