Good point Scott, I think that that helps clarify things, I still see
the two systems as one though ;-)
Quite a few people have asked for the paper we wrote, this is probably
going to make you laugh...
The publishers troubador have a really wonderful web site that supports
deep linking,, erm NOT!! Oh the irony!
http://www.troubador.co.uk/journals/buy_journals.asp?journal=itse
then scroll down to
ITSE: Volume 1: Issue 2 : Paper 2
Developing interoperable taxonomy systems for sharing resources within
multidisciplinary communities of practice
Steven Richardson, Mark Childs and Jacqueline A Dempster.
BTW, congratulations on the XML binding! Looking forward to reading it
when I have a few spare moments!
Kind regards
Steve
Scott Wilson wrote:
>Rather than putting folksonomies into formal collection, the idea is to
>_not_ to try to put formal subject classification onto the wider
>Internet, but instead to support folksonomies instead where they can
>emerge; its considerably more cost effective than hiring Sarah to
>classify everything on the planet, much as I'm sure she'd like to :-P
>
>The more interesting question then is, how much of the resources used
>in education are going to be part of the 'walled garden' of the
>library/LCMS/CMS/LMS, and what is going to be taken from the wider
>Internet.
>
>- S
>
>
>
|