|
|
|
Size
|
DELOS Summer School 2005
|
Joy Davidson |
Mon, 2 May 2005 16:24:40 +0100 |
127 lines |
[Fwd: [LTSC-LOM:] ProLearn LOMI Research Seminars]
|
Phil Barker |
Tue, 3 May 2005 09:36:27 +0100 |
66 lines |
Do they mean metadata?!
|
Lorna Campbell |
Thu, 5 May 2005 14:48:32 +0100 |
88 lines |
Re: Do they mean metadata?!
|
Rowin Young |
Thu, 5 May 2005 14:53:23 +0100 |
68 lines |
Re: Do they mean metadata?!
|
Sarah Currier |
Thu, 5 May 2005 15:03:43 +0100 |
230 lines |
Re: Do they mean metadata?!
|
George Macgregor |
Thu, 5 May 2005 15:06:06 +0100 |
102 lines |
Re: Do they mean metadata?!
|
Steve Richardson |
Thu, 5 May 2005 15:10:35 +0100 |
110 lines |
Re: Do they mean metadata?!
|
Wilbert Kraan |
Thu, 5 May 2005 17:41:24 +0100 |
133 lines |
Re: Do they mean metadata?!
|
Sarah Currier |
Thu, 5 May 2005 18:03:52 +0100 |
190 lines |
Re: Do they mean metadata?!
|
Simon Grant |
Thu, 5 May 2005 19:03:31 +0100 |
55 lines |
Re: Do they mean metadata?!
|
Steve Richardson |
Thu, 5 May 2005 19:25:57 +0100 |
254 lines |
Mac OS X system metadata
|
Scott Wilson |
Fri, 6 May 2005 15:02:48 +1000 |
78 lines |
Re: Do they mean metadata?!
|
George Macgregor |
Fri, 6 May 2005 14:18:53 +0100 |
344 lines |
CoLIS Workshop Announcement and Call for Contributions
|
Robert John Robertson |
Fri, 6 May 2005 19:17:59 +0100 |
118 lines |
Re: Do they mean metadata?!
|
Scott Wilson |
Sun, 8 May 2005 13:35:46 +1000 |
275 lines |
Re: Do they mean metadata?!
|
George Macgregor |
Mon, 9 May 2005 11:35:53 +0100 |
336 lines |
Re: Do they mean metadata?!
|
Sarah Currier |
Mon, 9 May 2005 11:49:26 +0100 |
887 lines |
Re: Do they mean metadata?!
|
Vashti Zarach |
Mon, 9 May 2005 12:46:23 +0100 |
561 lines |
Re: Do they mean metadata?!
|
Steve Richardson |
Mon, 9 May 2005 12:49:08 +0100 |
523 lines |
Re: Do they mean metadata?!
|
Steve Richardson |
Mon, 9 May 2005 13:21:29 +0100 |
697 lines |
Re: Do they mean metadata?!
|
Vashti Zarach |
Mon, 9 May 2005 13:53:40 +0100 |
791 lines |
Re: Do they mean metadata?!
|
Sarah Currier |
Mon, 9 May 2005 14:00:06 +0100 |
2073 lines |
Re: Do they mean metadata?! OT
|
Suzanne Hardy |
Mon, 9 May 2005 14:07:16 +0100 |
950 lines |
Re: Do they mean metadata?!
|
Paul Hollands |
Mon, 9 May 2005 14:11:06 +0100 |
60 lines |
Re: Do they mean metadata?! OT
|
Phil Barker |
Mon, 9 May 2005 14:20:36 +0100 |
41 lines |
Re: Do they mean metadata?!
|
Sarah Currier |
Mon, 9 May 2005 14:21:59 +0100 |
48 lines |
Re: Do they mean metadata?!
|
Paul Hollands |
Mon, 9 May 2005 14:27:26 +0100 |
20 lines |
Re: Do they mean metadata?!
|
Vashti Zarach |
Mon, 9 May 2005 14:32:01 +0100 |
68 lines |
Re: Do they mean metadata?!
|
Suzanne Hardy |
Mon, 9 May 2005 14:34:35 +0100 |
52 lines |
Re: Do they mean metadata?!
|
George Macgregor |
Mon, 9 May 2005 14:52:25 +0100 |
603 lines |
Re: Do they mean metadata?!
|
Steve Richardson |
Mon, 9 May 2005 15:17:00 +0100 |
1122 lines |
Re: Do they mean metadata?!
|
Paul Hollands |
Mon, 9 May 2005 15:22:13 +0100 |
39 lines |
Re: Do they mean metadata?!
|
George Macgregor |
Mon, 9 May 2005 16:03:55 +0100 |
1277 lines |
Re: Do they mean metadata?!
|
Sarah Currier |
Mon, 9 May 2005 16:49:32 +0100 |
84 lines |
Re: Do they mean metadata?!
|
Scott Wilson |
Tue, 10 May 2005 15:06:38 +1000 |
81 lines |
a moratorium on metadata?
|
Scott Wilson |
Thu, 12 May 2005 09:25:35 +1000 |
106 lines |
Re: a moratorium on metadata?
|
Simon Grant |
Thu, 12 May 2005 07:27:13 +0100 |
53 lines |
XML Schema Definition Language Binding for Learning Object Metadata
|
Pierre Gorissen |
Thu, 12 May 2005 10:38:30 +0200 |
47 lines |
Re: XML Schema Definition Language Binding for Learning Object Metadata
|
Phil Barker |
Thu, 12 May 2005 10:12:10 +0100 |
63 lines |
[Fwd: [LOM-XML:] FW: P1484.12.3 Approval Notification]
|
Phil Barker |
Thu, 12 May 2005 10:15:20 +0100 |
121 lines |
Re: XML Schema Definition Language Binding for Learning Object Metadata
|
Andy Powell |
Thu, 12 May 2005 11:10:31 +0100 |
62 lines |
Re: a moratorium on metadata?
|
Steve Richardson |
Thu, 12 May 2005 12:50:02 +0100 |
100 lines |
Re: Do they mean metadata?!
|
Steve Richardson |
Thu, 12 May 2005 14:51:12 +0100 |
53 lines |
Re: XML Schema Definition Language Binding for Learning Object Metadata
|
Lorna Campbell |
Thu, 12 May 2005 17:12:12 +0100 |
110 lines |
Re: XML Schema Definition Language Binding for Learning Object Metadata
|
Wilbert Kraan |
Thu, 12 May 2005 15:08:01 -0500 |
80 lines |
Re: XML Schema Definition Language Binding for Learning Object Metadata
|
Pierre Gorissen |
Thu, 12 May 2005 22:43:36 +0200 |
80 lines |
Re: XML Schema Definition Language Binding for Learning Object Metadata
|
Daniel R. Rehak |
Thu, 12 May 2005 20:49:41 -0400 |
111 lines |
Re: XML Schema Definition Language Binding for Learning Object Metadata
|
Scott Wilson |
Fri, 13 May 2005 14:25:53 +1000 |
149 lines |
Re: XML Schema Definition Language Binding for Learning Object Metadata
|
Pierre Gorissen |
Fri, 13 May 2005 08:25:11 +0200 |
191 lines |
New British Standard on interoperability between metadata systems
|
Phil Barker |
Fri, 13 May 2005 12:32:47 +0100 |
45 lines |
Re: XML Schema Definition Language Binding for Learning Object Metadata
|
Lorna Campbell |
Fri, 13 May 2005 12:34:15 +0100 |
175 lines |
Re: XML Schema Definition Language Binding for Learning Object Metadata
|
Phil Barker |
Fri, 13 May 2005 13:05:39 +0100 |
56 lines |
Re: XML Schema Definition Language Binding for Learning Object Metadata
|
Scott Wilson |
Sun, 15 May 2005 12:47:45 +1000 |
123 lines |
Identifiers for QTI assessmentItems
|
Rowin Young |
Tue, 17 May 2005 15:16:59 +0100 |
215 lines |
How do you refer to a different system's cataloguing record for an item?
|
RILEY, Elizabeth |
Wed, 18 May 2005 11:19:55 +1000 |
30 lines |
Re: How do you refer to a different system's cataloguing record for an item?
|
Daniel R. Rehak |
Tue, 17 May 2005 21:45:16 -0400 |
75 lines |
Re: How do you refer to a different system's cataloguing record for an item?
|
Mike Collett |
Wed, 18 May 2005 11:06:20 +0100 |
113 lines |
Survey on UKEL
|
Phil Barker |
Wed, 18 May 2005 11:21:04 +0100 |
122 lines |
Invitation to attend DCC Site Visit - Glasgow
|
Phil Barker |
Wed, 18 May 2005 11:27:39 +0100 |
79 lines |
Which LOM.Classification Purpose (LOM 9.1) for syllabus, curriculum data?
|
Flack, Irvin |
Thu, 19 May 2005 12:29:15 +1000 |
50 lines |
[Fwd: Re: [CETIS-METADATA] Which LOM.Classification Purpose (LOM 9.1) for syllabus, curriculum data?]
|
Sarah Currier |
Thu, 19 May 2005 12:37:59 +0100 |
275 lines |
DCC Workshop on Persistent Identifiers - Registration now open
|
Phil Barker |
Thu, 19 May 2005 16:07:44 +0100 |
154 lines |
Re: [Fwd: Re: [CETIS-METADATA] Which LOM.Classification Purpose (LOM 9.1) for syllabus, curriculum data?]
|
Flack, Irvin |
Fri, 20 May 2005 12:16:55 +1000 |
465 lines |
google vs librarians
|
Amber Thomas |
Fri, 20 May 2005 12:31:16 +0100 |
145 lines |
Re: google vs librarians
|
Jake Wallis |
Fri, 20 May 2005 13:23:38 +0100 |
395 lines |
Re: google vs librarians
|
Jerome Di Pietro |
Fri, 20 May 2005 14:57:45 +0100 |
573 lines |
Extending/modifying LOM vocabularies
|
Flack, Irvin |
Mon, 23 May 2005 10:37:57 +1000 |
48 lines |
Re: Extending/modifying LOM vocabularies
|
Sarah Currier |
Mon, 23 May 2005 09:38:47 +0100 |
134 lines |
Early bird deadline approaching - Metadata workshop.
|
Gillian Sinclair |
Mon, 23 May 2005 16:26:27 +0100 |
36 lines |
What do we mean by metadata?
|
Simon Grant |
Tue, 24 May 2005 07:23:16 +0100 |
72 lines |
Re: What do we mean by metadata?
|
Steve Richardson |
Tue, 24 May 2005 10:00:19 +0100 |
100 lines |
Re: What do we mean by metadata?
|
Steve Richardson |
Tue, 24 May 2005 11:15:52 +0100 |
76 lines |
Re: What do we mean by metadata?
|
Simon Grant |
Tue, 24 May 2005 12:36:36 +0100 |
74 lines |
Re: What do we mean by metadata?
|
George Macgregor |
Tue, 24 May 2005 12:42:37 +0100 |
146 lines |
before it gets all serious again...
|
Sarah Currier |
Tue, 24 May 2005 13:30:37 +0100 |
88 lines |
Re: What do we mean by metadata?
|
Simon Grant |
Tue, 24 May 2005 16:05:29 +0100 |
63 lines |
Re: What do we mean by metadata?
|
Fred Riley |
Tue, 24 May 2005 16:39:48 +0100 |
48 lines |
Re: What do we mean by metadata?
|
Scott Wilson |
Wed, 25 May 2005 09:47:14 +1000 |
111 lines |
Re: What do we mean by metadata?
|
Rob Wilson |
Wed, 25 May 2005 07:21:52 +0100 |
16 lines |
Re: What do we mean by metadata?
|
Simon Grant |
Wed, 25 May 2005 07:57:30 +0100 |
33 lines |
Fw: What do we mean by metadata?
|
Melanie Bates |
Wed, 25 May 2005 08:18:52 +0100 |
53 lines |
Re: What do we mean by metadata?
|
Tom Franklin |
Wed, 25 May 2005 09:37:40 +0100 |
34 lines |
Re: What do we mean by metadata?
|
Andy Heath |
Wed, 25 May 2005 10:17:49 +0100 |
67 lines |
Re: What do we mean by metadata?
|
Simon Grant |
Wed, 25 May 2005 13:08:30 +0100 |
107 lines |
Re: What do we mean by metadata?
|
Andy Heath |
Wed, 25 May 2005 13:18:15 +0100 |
26 lines |
Re: What do we mean by metadata?
|
Steve Richardson |
Wed, 25 May 2005 13:42:04 +0100 |
180 lines |
legal metadata and resource discovery
|
Amber Thomas |
Wed, 25 May 2005 15:26:02 +0100 |
153 lines |
Re: legal metadata and resource discovery
|
John Casey |
Wed, 25 May 2005 15:47:43 +0100 |
215 lines |
Re: legal metadata and resource discovery
|
Scott Wilson |
Thu, 26 May 2005 12:03:19 +1000 |
365 lines |
Re: Fw: What do we mean by metadata?
|
Lassi Nirhamo |
Thu, 26 May 2005 12:17:58 +0300 |
99 lines |
Re: Extending/modifying LOM vocabularies
|
Phil Barker |
Thu, 26 May 2005 10:29:09 +0100 |
86 lines |
Re: Extending/modifying LOM vocabularies
|
Lassi Nirhamo |
Thu, 26 May 2005 13:44:02 +0300 |
101 lines |
Re: What do we mean by metadata?
|
Simon Grant |
Thu, 26 May 2005 15:04:40 +0100 |
55 lines |
Re: legal metadata and resource discovery
|
Kenny Baird |
Thu, 26 May 2005 15:25:29 +0100 |
98 lines |
Re: Extending/modifying LOM vocabularies
|
RILEY, Elizabeth |
Fri, 27 May 2005 14:14:02 +1000 |
71 lines |
Re: legal metadata and resource discovery
|
Scott Wilson |
Fri, 27 May 2005 16:25:20 +1000 |
501 lines |
Re: What do we mean by metadata?
|
Mikael Nilsson |
Fri, 27 May 2005 09:14:41 +0200 |
157 lines |
Re: legal metadata and resource discovery
|
Andy Powell |
Fri, 27 May 2005 08:31:38 +0100 |
196 lines |
Re: What do we mean by metadata?
|
Andy Powell |
Fri, 27 May 2005 08:37:32 +0100 |
31 lines |
Re: What do we mean by metadata?
|
Mikael Nilsson |
Fri, 27 May 2005 10:09:05 +0200 |
82 lines |
Re: legal metadata and resource discovery
|
Phil Barker |
Fri, 27 May 2005 09:56:24 +0100 |
43 lines |
Re: What do we mean by metadata?
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Fri, 27 May 2005 10:10:50 +0100 |
49 lines |
Re: legal metadata and resource discovery
|
moira massey |
Fri, 27 May 2005 10:12:15 +0100 |
351 lines |
Re: What do we mean by metadata?
|
Mikael Nilsson |
Fri, 27 May 2005 11:41:01 +0200 |
126 lines |
Re: What do we mean by metadata?
|
Matthew J. Dovey |
Fri, 27 May 2005 11:07:32 +0100 |
64 lines |
Re: What do we mean by metadata?
|
Mikael Nilsson |
Fri, 27 May 2005 12:08:24 +0200 |
56 lines |
Re: What do we mean by metadata?
|
Steve Richardson |
Fri, 27 May 2005 11:12:37 +0100 |
51 lines |
Re: What do we mean by metadata?
|
Mikael Nilsson |
Fri, 27 May 2005 13:05:50 +0200 |
101 lines |
Re: What do we mean by metadata?
|
Mikael Nilsson |
Fri, 27 May 2005 13:18:50 +0200 |
92 lines |
Re: What do we mean by metadata?
|
Phil Barker |
Fri, 27 May 2005 12:38:34 +0100 |
43 lines |
Re: What do we mean by metadata?
|
Mikael Nilsson |
Fri, 27 May 2005 13:59:53 +0200 |
73 lines |
Re: What do we mean by metadata?
|
Phil Barker |
Fri, 27 May 2005 13:05:14 +0100 |
49 lines |
Re: What do we mean by metadata?
|
Steve Richardson |
Fri, 27 May 2005 13:36:35 +0100 |
149 lines |
Re: legal metadata and resource discovery
|
Andy Heath |
Sat, 28 May 2005 12:59:21 +0100 |
30 lines |
Distributed Service Registry Workshop 14-15 July 2005 - Registration open
|
Natasha Bishop |
Tue, 31 May 2005 16:17:50 +0100 |
58 lines |