JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for MEDIEVAL-RELIGION Archives


MEDIEVAL-RELIGION Archives

MEDIEVAL-RELIGION Archives


MEDIEVAL-RELIGION@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

MEDIEVAL-RELIGION Home

MEDIEVAL-RELIGION Home

MEDIEVAL-RELIGION  May 2005

MEDIEVAL-RELIGION May 2005

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: saints of the day 28. May

From:

Christopher Crockett <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

medieval-religion - Scholarly discussions of medieval religious culture <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sun, 29 May 2005 13:54:27 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (117 lines)

medieval-religion: Scholarly discussions of medieval religion and culture

From: John Dillon <[log in to unmask]>


> An Italian-language site, with exterior photographs and a floor plan,
on the rural church of San Gemiliano at Sestu (CA) is here:

> http://www.ilportalesardo.it/monumenti/casestu.htm

goodness, perhaps vying for the prize as Ugliest Church associated with a
Phyllistinean Saint.


looks like a danged tithebarn, but without the interesting carpentry.

> The church of San Gemiliano (San Miliano) at Villanova Truschedu was
begun in "romanesque" style in the 1500s and completed in next century
in Catalan Gothic.

> http://www.oristanoedintorni.it/online/cat082.htm
> http://web.tiscali.it/acres/
> http://www.oristanoedintorni.it/fdg/2005/02/16.htm



rather than seeing this as some sort of a "Romanesque revival" (or even the
persistance of the "style" in a provincial backwater) in the Italy of c. 1500,
unencumbered by any real knowledge of the place, region or country, i'd rather
see its sole "romanesque" element --the use of round arches over the doorway
and in the tracery of the rose window above-- as being an attempt by a
provincial shop to cater to the "Modern", Classical tastes which by then had
become universal in Italy.

the "romanesque" "style", universally found all over Europe in the 11th and
12th c., persisted well into the following century(s) in provincial backwaters
in France and elsewhere, examples of which sometimes earning the sobriquet
"second [or third, depending upon how one counts such things] romanesque"
among Art Hysterians trying to explain the phenomenon by piling yet another
Construct onto an already creaky constructural fabric.

as far as i am aware there was no "Romanesque revival" until the 19th century,
though elements of the style were consciously used in some 15th-16th c.
Flemish paintings when there was a reference to be made to an Old Testiment
topology especially within what was essentially and primarily a New Testament
scene.

cf. the clealry "romanesque" architecure here

http://www.wga.hu/art/e/eyck_van/jan/21paele/21paele1.jpg

complete with very, very accurately rendered "romanesque" historiated and
interlaced foliate capitals

http://www.wga.hu/art/e/eyck_van/jan/21paele/21paele4.jpg

or here:

http://www.wga.hu/art/e/eyck_van/jan/02page/25tripty.jpg

a brief discussion of this use of "architectural typology" as an integral
element in the iconography of such paintings is here

http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0422/is_1_81/ai_54517312/pg_2

"Broederlam appears to use the foreground Romanesque building to indicate the
period before the coming of the Savior, while the enigmatic Gothic structure
to the left would accommodate a future use made necessary by developments
following the Annunciation."

that's the idea, though the painting refered to,

http://www.mythfolklore.net/bibgreek/images/gallery/broderlam.jpg

from the end of the 14th c. is at the beginning of the exploitation of this
typological concept and, as executed, Broederlam's "romanesque" has a decidely
"gothic" flavor to it, asided from the round arches.

while, by van Eyck's time eyes had been sharpened sufficiently to allow a more
"realistic" distinction between the two styles.

within the context of middlevil art generally it is quite remarkable --and
significant-- to note how difficult it seems to have been for an artist of one
period to convincingly work in a style which was not of his own.

there's some Profound Truth hidden in that simple fact, but i forget just now
what it is.

best,

c



c


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

"To initiate a war of aggression ... is not only an international crime, it is
the supreme international crime, differing only from other war crimes in that
it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole."

--International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg, Germany, 1946

**********************************************************************
To join the list, send the message: join medieval-religion YOUR NAME
to: [log in to unmask]
To send a message to the list, address it to:
[log in to unmask]
To leave the list, send the message: leave medieval-religion
to: [log in to unmask]
In order to report problems or to contact the list's owners, write to:
[log in to unmask]
For further information, visit our web site:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/medieval-religion.html

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager