Matt
I think there is a useful distinction between journals that present evidence
and those that also discuss EBM.
If you intend to examine the latter then Journal of Evaluation In Clinical
Practice and Bandolier probably need inclusion
Even if you are only including the former you missed the "Evidence Based
Healthcare and Public Health" journal:
http://www.harcourt-international.com/journals/ebhc/ and the French journal
"Prescrire International"
Incidentally support for your view seems to lie in the recent article:
Elstein AS.On the origins and development of evidence-based medicine and
medical decision making.
Inflamm Res. 2004 Aug;53 Suppl 2:S184-9. Epub 2004 Aug 10.
I suppose "Inflammation Research" is an appropriate vector for this argument
given the history of debates in EBM!
Andrew
----- Original Message -----
From: "Matt Williams" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2005 1:43 PM
Subject: Evidence-Based Journals
> Dear All,
>
> I am trying to show my boss that most journals that talk about EBM use a
> statistical, and specifically Bayesian, approach.
>
> I've pulled the following journal names from pubmed:
>
> 1: Clinical evidence.
>
> 2: Evidence-based dentistry.
>
> 3: Evidence-based medicine.
>
> 4: Evidence-based mental health.
>
> 5: Evidence-based nursing.
>
> 6: Evidence report/technology assessment
>
> 7: Zeitschrift fur arztliche Fortbildung und Qualitatssicherung : in
> Zusammenarbeit mit der Kaiserin-Friedrich-Stiftung fur das arztliche
> Fortbildungswesen.
>
> 8: ACP Journal Club
>
> What I'm interested in is:
>
> 1: Are there any other journals that I've missed (I'm sure there must
> be)
>
> 2: Does anyone know anything about 7 (My German is a little poor)
>
> 3: Would members of this list agree with a (roughly phrased) comment
> that "EBM, as it is currently practised, predominantly relies on
> statistical and Bayes theory as a formal basis"
>
> I look forward to your comments,
>
> Matt
>
|