JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for RADSTATS Archives


RADSTATS Archives

RADSTATS Archives


RADSTATS@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

RADSTATS Home

RADSTATS Home

RADSTATS  2005

RADSTATS 2005

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: FOI - it actually works

From:

Robert Moore <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Robert Moore <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 11:35:17 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (122 lines)

It works both ways: I have been trying to get hold of some statistics,
collected in 2003, from Flintshire County Council. We were told they would
be ready late in 2003, then January 2004, February 2004, summer 2004,
October 2004, 'by Christmas' 2004, early in 2005. We were told the data
were delivered in January 2004 but officials had not had time to read them,
so wait until February, in February we told they did not have them at all
(and that a public meeting had misunderstood the statement that 'we only
had them last night and have to read them first'), in the summer they only
had an executive summary but we couldn't have it until councillors had seen
it in October. In October they were 'validating' the data - checking the
work of consultants, so councillors hadn't yet seen them ... and so it went
on. On the first working day of 2005 I invoked the FOI Act to get the data
immediately. I was refused under Section 22 of the Act covering
'information intended for future publication'.
Section 22 is well-named and will, I guess, be know as 'FOI Catch-22'
Robert





--On 01 February 2005 15:16 +0000 Mike Brewer <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Dear List
>
> Although not strictly about statistics, I thought others would be
> interested in how the new rights we have since January 2005 under the
> Freedom of Information Act are changing things.
>
> In 2004, I twice asked the Treasury what assumption had been made about
> the level of the child tax credit when they made their forecast of
> spending on tax credits in 2006-7 and beyond (or, alternatively, what had
> they assumed about the annual uprating). Both times, they ducked the
> question.
>
> In particular, in July 2004, they said:
>
> "Uprating the child element of CTC is covered in a paragraph 3.67 (page
> 35) of the Child Poverty Review which says: `The Government is committed
> to increasing the child element of the CTC at least in line with earnings
> until the end of this Parliament [ie 2005]. Rates for future years will be
> based on careful monitoring of the effects of current policies on both
> employment and child poverty, recognising that work is the best long-term
> route out of poverty for most families. Future rates will be announced at
> the time of the Pre-Budget Report, to take effect in the following
> financial year.'"
>
> In December 2004, they said:
>
> "The Government has committed to uprate the child element of Child Tax
> Credit in line with average earnings for the rest of this Parliament;
> decisions for the next Parliament will be for the manifesto. The Child
> Poverty Review, published alongside Spending Review 2004 set out
> (paragraph 3.67, page 35) the Government's general approach to decisions
> on uprating the child element of CTC:
>
> `The Government is committed to increasing the child element of the CTC at
> least in line with earnings until the end of this Parliament. Rates for
> future years will be based on careful monitoring of the effects of current
> policies on both employment and child poverty,recognising that work is the
> best long-term route out of poverty for most families. Future rates will
> be announced at the time of the Pre-Budget Report, to take effect in the
> following financial year.'
>
> The Government is committed to reporting to Parliament on the uprating of
> tax credit rates and thresholds each year, and in particular stating
> whether the rates and thresholds have maintained their value in real
> terms. Section 41 of the Tax Credits Act 2002 states that:
>
> The Treasury must, in each tax year, review the amounts specified in
> subsection (2) in order to determine whether they have retained their
> value in relation to the general level of prices in the United Kingdom as
> estimated by the Treasury in such manner as it considers appropriate.
> (subsection 2 refers to the sections of the Act which specify the tax
> credit rates and thresholds)."
>
> As you can see, neither response answered my question.
>
> Having asked again, on 5 January 2005, citing my rights under FOI, I got
> the answer:
>
> "Consistent with usual forecasting conventions the assumption underlying
> the forecast of tax credit costs in financial years 2006-7 to 2007-08
> (the end of the 2004 Spending Review period) reverts to the policy-neutral
> assumption that the child element of Child Tax Credit is uprated in line
> with prices (the increase in the RPI in the year to the previous
> September). Decisions on the actual uprating of all elements of tax
> credits are taken as part of the annual Budget process."
>
> Hooray!
>
> Mike Brewer
>
> ******************************************************
> Please note that if you press the 'Reply' button your
> message will go only to the sender of this message.
> If you want to reply to the whole list, use your mailer's
> 'Reply-to-All' button to send your message automatically
> to [log in to unmask]
> *******************************************************






Professor Robert Moore
Department of Sociology,Social
  Policy and Social Work Studies
University of Liverpool
L69 7BZ

44 (0) 1352 714456

******************************************************
Please note that if you press the 'Reply' button your
message will go only to the sender of this message.
If you want to reply to the whole list, use your mailer's
'Reply-to-All' button to send your message automatically
to [log in to unmask]
*******************************************************

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager