The question seems ambiguous (is this a projective question about "other
people's" views?) vague (what's "harsh"?) and double-barrelled (inviting
answers either on current laws or forced repatriation), but I can't see why
it's fradulent. What was the problem?
Paul Spicker
******************************************************
Please note that if you press the 'Reply' button your
message will go only to the sender of this message.
If you want to reply to the whole list, use your mailer's
'Reply-to-All' button to send your message automatically
to [log in to unmask]
*******************************************************
|