I am very unhappy if this discussion has been taken off the list.
I don't know my about the specific topic, but I was learning a lot from the discussion and found it fascinating.
Please return it.
Best wishes
Penny Mullen
-----Original Message-----
From: email list for Radical Statistics on behalf of Ray Thomas
Sent: Mon 11/04/2005 12:58
To: [log in to unmask]
Cc:
Subject: Re: Discussion on Maternity Statistics
>Until such a time as some clarity arises as to what, if any, issues can be
>discussed in-depth on this list, I will respond to this message of yours
>off-list.
I'm sorry that what looks like an important discussions of the influence or
statistics, or the lack of influence of statistics, has been taken off the
list. Can we have a statement from the list owner about how this has
happened?
Can Alison also supply a vital bit of evidence from the earler discussion,
about how the operative delivery rates vary by age group at a particular
point of time - such as that shown by the latest published statistics.
Maybe Alison, Professor of mid-wifery, could post those figures (that are
'unfortunately not enough published')as a complement to her superb chart?'
Ray Thomas
----- Original Message -----
From: Macfarlane, Alison
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 9:53 AM
Subject: Re: Maternity statistics for England published to day
>Age specific rates have been increasing, as can be seen each time they are
>published, unfortunately not often enough
******************************************************
Please note that if you press the 'Reply' button your
message will go only to the sender of this message.
If you want to reply to the whole list, use your mailer's
'Reply-to-All' button to send your message automatically
to [log in to unmask]
*******************************************************
|