Oh, I just misread your sentence, Anny. But whether W was *rational* or
not is a moot point. There was the famous poker scandal with Popper, for
instance. I do think he was telling Mac something, it's just that he had
to get out or something & didn't finish - oh those mists of time, I
sometimes doubt whether the past (mine specifically) happened at all,
it's all so hazy & schematic but for certain little realistic details
cunningly placed to make me believe in the whole trumpery concoction. Ahimé!
mj
Anny Ballardini wrote:
>Hi Martin, I knew that - that poor Baudelaire (whatever he did I will always
>justify him) mixed up there with Nietzsche would have created probl. as a
>matter of fact I put in brackets his probl. due to the second marriage of
>his mother, but whatever, and I know he never taught. I had a friend who was
>the student of James Joyce when he was down there in Trieste, a most sweet
>lady who was well blind but still incredibly beautiful with her well-combed
>hair and came to see me at the library with her other friend who led her all
>the way down on the snow and the ice.
>This is the little I have to tell you.
>And I do not think that Wittgenstein gave away anything on trains, he was a
>rational thinker not a surrealist inventor.
>
>Anny Ballardini
>http://annyballardini.blogspot.com
>http://www.fieralingue.it/modules.php?name=poetshome
>The aim of the poet is to awaken emotions in the soul, not to gather
>admirers.
>Stalker, Andrei Tarkovsky
>
>
>
>
>
|