> > For those who dinnae ken, bright is the term messrs Dawkins
> > and Dennett give themselves in distinction from superstitious
> > fowk who believe in doG. It's probably googleable.
> > >>
> >
> > See, you're doing it again -- trying to make me look stoopid.
>
> I thought that at some point it was reasonable to give fowk the foggiest
> idea of what I was rabbiting on about. I'm not alone in thinking that the
> term 'bright' is spectacularly inappropriate, though.
>
> P
See, you *can* do it when you try.
Now, if you'd just be good enough in future to give page-references to
Chapman issues, it would save me having to hunt through the contents pages.
A Singularly Picky Pedant.
|