[apologies for multiple postings]
SECOND CALL FOR PAPERS (deadline 6 February 2006)
***RESEARCH INTO PRACTICE 2006***
http://www.herts.ac.uk/artdes1/research/res2prac/index.html
The fourth international biennial conference on the foundations of
practice-based research in art and design will be convened at the
University of Hertfordshire, UK, on 7 & 8 July 2006.
The theme of RESEARCH INTO PRACTICE 2006 is the role of the context
in the interpretation of artefacts and visual semantics in art and
design research.
In recent years there has been much international debate about the
role of the artefact in art and design research. The debate has
considered, for example, what contribution the artefact makes to the
research process and to the communication of the outcomes. However,
artefacts are not interpreted in isolation. The question of what
contribution the artefact makes has to be considered in the light of
how the artefact is interpreted. This interpretation takes place in a
context; for example in the studio, in a gallery, in the market
place, online, in the context of "research" or in the context of
"design", etc. Research into Practice 2006 focuses on these contexts
and explores the instrumentality of the context on the reception of
artefacts as constituting or contributing to research.
Topics that might be considered include, but are not restricted to:
* Is the researcher responsible for establishing a context for
the "correct" interpretation of the artefact, i.e. is that also part
of doing research?
* Can the research content be activated/deactivated by changing
the context of reception?
* Are certain types of context more research-friendly than others?
* Is it the context that makes research into research, [cf. the
Institutional Theory of Art]
* What is signified by research being undertaken in the context
of a university or by being done by those labelled as researchers, or
being funded by a Research Council?
* Does research demand new types of context, and what would they
need to be like?
* What is the impact of traditional academic attempts at the
recontextualization of research from other disciplines outside art and design?
* Is decontextualization or disinterest, either possible or desirable?
FURTHER INFORMATION
The conference website is now available and will be updated as
arrangements are confirmed.
Notification of updates will be sent directly to subscribers on the
RESEARCH INTO PRACTICE mailing list.
To subscribe to the mailing list please send your contact details to
the conference organiser at [log in to unmask] If you are already
a subscriber you will have been "blind carbon copied" this
announcement (your listed email address will appear in the "To."
section of the header).
http://www.herts.ac.uk/artdes1/research/res2prac/index.html
***RESEARCH INTO PRACTICE 2006***
************************************************************
Dr Michael A R Biggs
Professor of Aesthetics and Associate Dean Research
Faculty for the Creative and Cultural Industries
University of Hertfordshire
College Lane, Hatfield, AL10 9AB
UK
T 00 44 (0)1707 285341
F 00 44 (0)1707 285350
E <[log in to unmask]>
http://www.herts.ac.uk/artdes1/research/tvad/biggs1.html
For information about University research in art and design visit
http://www.herts.ac.uk/artdes1/research/
For information on the Research into Practice conference 2006 visit
http://www.herts.ac.uk/artdes1/research/res2prac/confhome.html
************************************************************
|